In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: Dan took the rear seat while Bill claimed the front because his "Dibs!" was quicker.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to bill because bill claimed front but dan is took seat. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: The lawyer asked the witness a question, but he was reluctant to repeat it.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the lawyer because Because a person that has been asked the question is likely to answer. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: Although they ran at about the same speed, Sue beat Sally because she had such a good start.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to sue because Sue was the winner running at the same speed; therefore she must have had the good start. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Correct