In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: There is a gap in the wall. You can see the garden behind it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the wall because You can't see through walls. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: Carol believed that Rebecca suspected that she had stolen the watch.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to carol because Carol believed that Rebecca regretted. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: The actress used to be named Terpsichore, but she changed it to Tina a  few years ago, because she figured it was easier to pronounce.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to tina because she changes to tina but actual name Terpsichore. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Correct