In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: The sculpture rolled off the shelf because it wasn't level.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the shelf because it sits on top of the art piece, which is a concrete slab that is at least 4 ft. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: I can't cut that tree down with that axe; it is too small.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the axe because of the axe's size. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: Since it was raining, I carried the newspaper over my backpack to keep it dry.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the backpack because the only other thing I had on was my wet wet clothes. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong