In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: I couldn't put the pot on the shelf because it was too tall.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pot because as we're all aware of by now, the pot is a big issue in this game. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Lily spoke to Donna, breaking her concentration.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to donna because Donna was the one trying to concentrate. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: George got free tickets to the play, but he gave them to Eric, even though he was particularly eager to see it.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because he is the only member of the group who remembers the play's plot and how it relates to his. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong