In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Dan had to stop Bill from toying with the injured bird. He is very compassionate.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to dan because he is actually a 'he' in the first place, but he might be referring to his partner. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: I'm sure that my map will show this building; it is very good.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the map because it is the only building that could be built in the area in the mid game. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Joe paid the detective after he delivered the final report on the case.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the detective because it's quite possible that he has a name and they did not know it. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong