In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Dan took the rear seat while Bill claimed the front because his "Dibs!" was slow.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to dan because He took the rear seat. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Pam's parents came home and found her having sex with her boyfriend, Paul. They were embarrassed about it.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to pam and paul because The parents likely were upset therefore Pam and Paul would be the embarrassed ones. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Pam's parents came home and found her having sex with her boyfriend, Paul. They were embarrassed about it.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to pam and paul because the two have been together for years. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong