In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: I couldn't put the pot on the shelf because it was too tall.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pot because it is a good sized pot and I like the color of the pot. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: John promised Bill to leave, so an hour later he left.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to john because people who promise to leave leave later. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: My meeting started at 4:00 and I needed to catch the train at 4:30,  so there wasn't much time. Luckily, it was short, so it worked out.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the meeting because when talking about time, we do not describe trains as short. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Correct