In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Bob was playing cards with Adam and was way ahead. If Adam hadn't had a sudden run of good luck, he would have won.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bob because Adam because Bob was ahead. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Tom gave Ralph a lift to school so he wouldn't have to walk.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to ralph because Ralph is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Bob collapsed on the sidewalk. Soon he saw Carl coming to help. He was very concerned.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to carl because The red should refer to Carl as being the concerned one. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Correct