In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Anna did a lot worse than her good friend Lucy on the test because she had studied so hard.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to lucy because the one who studied the hardest did the best she is lucy. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: Susan knew that Ann's son had been in a car accident, so she told her about it.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to susan because Susan knew that Ann's son had been in a car accident she told her about it. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Sam's drawing was hung just above Tina's and it did look much better with another one below it.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to sam's drawing because Better look of drawing is Tina's. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct