In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Paul tried to call George on the phone, but he wasn't available.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because Paul not being available makes no sense. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: Look! There is a shark swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the duck because The duck is threatened. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: There is a pillar between me and the stage, and I can't see around it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pillar because Actually, the red pronoun "it" refers to the stage, which is the target of vision that is blocked by the intervening pillar, which is visible. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong