In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Joe's uncle can still beat him at tennis, even though he is 30 years older.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to joe's uncle because because it is unusual that he would lose. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: I put the heavy book on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because the 'book' is made out of a wood, but it's not specified. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of styrofoam.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because Because the table was crashed and a ball made of steel could crash right through it. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****