In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: As Andrea in the crop duster passed over Susan, she could see the landing strip.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to andrea because she is the only one of the three to not have an official name. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The painting in Mark's living room shows an oak tree. It is to the right of a house.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the oak tree because of the similarity between the two trees. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Sam tried to paint a picture of shepherds with sheep, but they ended up looking more like dogs.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the sheep because they are part of a group that looks like dogs, despite being not actually dogs. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Correct