In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: There is a gap in the wall. You can see the garden behind it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the wall because we can't see through  walls. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education. He is very grateful.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to charlie because charlie got his tuition paid so the he would be charlie as the grateful one. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: I poured water from the bottle into the cup until it was empty.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the bottle because of the 'it' in the middle. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong