In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: Pam's parents came home and found her having sex with her boyfriend, Paul. They were furious about it.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to pam's parents because yes, the red would refer to Pam's parents. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: John ordered Bill to leave, so an hour later he left.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bill because people who promise to leave leave later. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: The customer walked into the bank and stabbed one of the tellers. He was immediately taken to the police station.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to the customer because the assailant is said to have used a knife to attack the bank employee. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Wrong