In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Adam can't leave work here until Bob arrives to replace him. If Bob had  left home for work on time, he would be here by this time.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bob because bob delayed the arrival of adam by not leaving home early. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The dog chased the cat, which ran up a tree. It waited at the bottom.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the dog because it has always been the dog's hunting partner. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Fred and Alice had very warm down coats, but they were not prepared for the cold in Alaska.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to fred and alice because They were not prepared for the cold in Alaska but Fred and Alice had very warm down coats. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct