In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Sam took French classes from Adam, because he was eager to speak it fluently.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sam because Sam was eager to put to practice what he learnt. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Sid explained his theory to Mark but he couldn't convince him.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sid because his name is the same as the third letter in the word "sid". 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because The gang members is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Wrong