In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't use it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the path because blocked likely to the path. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: The lawyer asked the witness a question, but he was reluctant to repeat it.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the lawyer because he was reluctant to repeat it. The lawyer asked the witness a question. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: Sam broke both his ankles and he's walking with crutches. But a month or so from now they should be better.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the ankles because we think one but it happens another to do some things. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****