In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Pete envies Martin although he is very successful.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to pete because it says also as in even though they envy them, making it likely by he they meant Pete. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Fred watched TV while George went out to buy groceries. After an hour he got back.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because he is the only one who has a name like that, even though he is not yet born. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Paul tried to call George on the phone, but he wasn't successful.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to paul because he was in the room with George. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Wrong