In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because Yakutsk's army was much better equipped and ten times larger. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: They broadcast an announcement, but a subway came into the  station and I couldn't hear over it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the subway because the 'it' is the "it" that is likely to be the cause of the subway. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because The sentance describes who lost, and why Yakutsk had advantages. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Correct