In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Steve follows Fred's example in everything. He influences him hugely.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to fred because Steve is following Fred; He must be the one being influenced. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Emma did not pass the ball to Janie although she saw that she was open.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to emma because Emma was the one who did not pass the ball; Janie was the one open. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for deer on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to prehistoric humans because Archaeologists wouldn't likely be the ones hunting for deer. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct