In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't use it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the path because it runs through a large portion of the game, and is likely to be the final path we use. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: The older students were bullying the younger ones, so we punished them .
 Reason: The 'them' refers to the older students because old student bullying one so youngers. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: John promised Bill to leave, so an hour later he left.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to john because , as the other members of the crew said, 'he' seems to be the one who did. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong