In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: Dr. Adams informed Kate that she had cancer and presented several options for future treatment.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to kate because the doctor used the pronoun 'she' in the video. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: Pete envies Martin although he is very successful.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to pete because it says also as in even though they envy them, making it likely by he they meant Pete. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: Sam pulled up a chair to the piano, but it was broken, so he had to sing instead.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the piano because of the sound of the piano being broken, that is what the sound of the 'it' is. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Wrong