In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because cooperative is more likely to the interview. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Paul tried to call George on the phone, but he wasn't successful.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to paul because at the time of the incident, Paul had not yet met the teenager he was accused of raping. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: If the con artist has succeeded in fooling Sam, he would have lost a lot of money.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sam because Con artist fools Sam, thus con artist is main subject. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Wrong