In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Adam can't leave work here until Bob arrives to replace him. If Bob had  left home for work on time, he would be gone by this time.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to adam because he works at the shop. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The sack of potatoes had been placed below the bag of flour, so it had to be moved first.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the bag of flour because I believe that it would actually refer to the flour, because one would generally remove the item on top first.  Removing the object below might cause the item on top to fall. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Frank was upset with Tom because the toaster he had sold him didn't work.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to tom because an upset man is more toaster. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong