In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Jane knocked on Susan's door, but there was no answer. She was out.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to susan because she's the only one of the three who is still alive, and the other two are either dead. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Bill passed the gameboy to John because his turn was over.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to bill because the sentence was about bills action to pass the gameboy so his is referencing bill. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because The early humans would not have been hunting for evidence about themselves. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct