In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Sam pulled up a chair to the piano, but it was broken, so he had to stand instead.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the chair because it was the only one that was in the room. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: I can't cut that tree down with that axe; it is too small.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the axe because the tree is a 'it', but I think it is also a reference to the fact that it. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Beth didn't get angry with Sally, who had cut her off, because she stopped and apologized.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to sally because beth didn't get angry because she stopped and counted to ten. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong