In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: The man couldn't lift his son because he was so heavy.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the son because the boy is the only survivor. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Fred watched TV while George went out to buy groceries. After an hour he got back.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because George went out and came back, thus he is the pronoun. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Bob collapsed on the sidewalk. Soon he saw Carl coming to help. He was very ill.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to bob because they were both raised in the neighborhood. They were both born in the same town. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong