In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Alice tried frantically to stop her daughter from barking at the party, leaving us to wonder why she was behaving so strangely.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to alice's daughter because she is a member of Alice's family, and probably the only person who knows what is going on. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: They broadcast an announcement, but a subway came into the  station and I couldn't hear over it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the subway because there are two subway stations in the game. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Jim signaled the barman and gestured toward his empty glass
 Reason: The 'his' refers to jim because Jim wants the drink from the barman. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct