In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: John hired Bill to take care of him .
 Reason: The 'him' refers to john because You can't hire someone to take care of themselves. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: I was trying to open the lock with the key, but someone had filled the  keyhole with chewing gum, and I couldn't get it out.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the chewing gum because of the 'it' in the name. It's not a lock, it's a door. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Jane knocked on the door, and Susan answered it. She invited her to come out.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to jane because susan is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong