In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: In the middle of the outdoor concert, the rain started falling, but it continued until 10.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the concert because the rain was so severe to the point it became almost impossible to see through the stadium. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of styrofoam.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because The large ball   was made of steel because  it crashed right through the table. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: I poured water from the bottle into the cup until it was full.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the cup because containers I poured into will be full later. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Correct