In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: Fred and Alice had very warm down coats, but they were not prepared for the cold in Alaska.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to fred and alice because the coats are what is not enough for the cold. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: The dog chased the cat, which ran up a tree. It waited at the bottom.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the dog because it has always been the dog's hunting partner. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: Grace was happy to trade me her sweater for my jacket. She thinks it looks great on her.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the jacket because Grace liked the jacket. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Correct