In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: They broadcast an announcement, but a subway came into the  station and I couldn't hear over it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the subway because there are two subway stations in the game. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because cooperative is more likely to the interview. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: The sack of potatoes had been placed above the bag of flour, so it had to be moved first.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the sack of potatoes because it was placed above the flour and because it was placed above the bag of flour it was impossible to. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Correct