In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Joe paid the detective after he delivered the final report on the case.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the detective because he received the final report on the case.but Joe paid the detective after. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: My meeting started at 4:00 and I needed to catch the train at 4:30,  so there wasn't much time. Luckily, it was short, so it worked out.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the meeting because I did not leave the building until after I had finished. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Joe paid the detective after he received the final report on the case.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to joe because the detective delivered the final report. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Correct