In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it had a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the carrot because The carrot was being stuck by the pin; therefore it would have the hole. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The cat was lying by the mouse hole waiting for the mouse, but it was too impatient.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the cat because the mouse is a cat in the original "It's a Wonderful Life" film. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The sculpture rolled off the shelf because it wasn't anchored.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the sculpture because it is a sculpture of a man in a white suit. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong