In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: They broadcast an announcement, but a subway came into the  station and I couldn't hear it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the announcement because it is hard to hear over a noise generator. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: The painting in Mark's living room shows an oak tree. It is to the right of the bookcase.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the painting because The previous sentence describes a picture, not a house or a room. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: If the con artist has succeeded in fooling Sam, he would have lost a lot of money.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sam because A con artist that succeeds is not going to lose money so of course it's Sam would be the one that would be loosing money. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct