In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: I tried to paint a picture of an orchard, with lemons in the lemon trees,  but they came out looking more like telephone poles.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to lemon trees because Lemons in the lemon trees, but they came out looking more like telephone poles. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The firemen arrived after the police because they were coming from so far away.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the firemen because of the distance and the fact the firemen are wearing different uniforms. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Sid explained his theory to Mark but he couldn't understand him.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to mark because Mark  lesson to Sid explanations. but mark couldn't  believe. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong