In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: John ordered Bill to leave, so an hour later he left.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bill because Bill was being ordered to leave. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Susan knew that Ann's son had been in a car accident, because she told her about it.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to ann because 'she' is an important part of the story and the 'he' might refer to the son. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The woman held the girl against her chest
 Reason: The 'her' refers to the woman because It is more likely and common for the kidnapper to be acting voluntarily, and the kidnapee to be forced. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Wrong