In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: I can't cut that tree down with that axe; it is too thick.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the tree because The axe is smaller to cut the tree. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Joe's uncle can still beat him at tennis, even though he is 30 years younger.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to joe because JOE REFER MORE LIKELY JOE'S UNCLE. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: I was trying to open the lock with the key, but someone had filled the  keyhole with chewing gum, and I couldn't get it out.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the chewing gum because chewing gum is more likely to lock the keyhole. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Correct