In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Emma's mother had died long ago, and her education had been managed by an excellent woman as governess.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to emma because the mother was the ex-guardian. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The sun was covered by a thick cloud all morning, but luckily, by the time the picnic started, it was gone.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the cloud because it's also a reference to the fact that a large portion of the event was based on the cloud. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Look! There is a shark swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the duck because it has a shark on it. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong