TASK DEFINITION: In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
PROBLEM: Sentence: Jim signaled the barman and gestured toward his bathroom key.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to the barman because JIM REFER TO THA BARMAN. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Wrong

PROBLEM: Sentence: James asked Robert for a favor but he refused.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to robert because the favor was not answered. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Correct

PROBLEM: Sentence: If the con artist has succeeded in fooling Sam, he would have gotten a lot of money.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the con artist because a con gets money when his scam succeeds. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION:
Correct