In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: There is a gap in the wall. You can see the garden through it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the gap because the hole in the wall is close to the garden. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: I can't cut that tree down with that axe; it is too small.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the axe because The axe is smaller to cut the tree. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she slept with her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to the trainer because MADONNA REFER TO HER TRAINER. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****