In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Fred and Alice had very warm down coats, but they were not enough for the cold in Alaska.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to coats because The coats have no perception of cold or how prepared they are. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she slept with her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to the trainer because MADONNA REFER TO HER TRAINER. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of styrofoam.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because Styrofoam is crashed right through the table. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct