In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Susan knew that Ann's son had been in a car accident, because she told her about it.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to ann because she felt that Ann was not there to help her son. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Sam tried to paint a picture of shepherds with sheep, but they ended up looking more like dogs.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the sheep because The pronoun is likely to refer to sheep because they look more like dogs. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: Bill passed the half-empty plate to John because he was full.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bill because Bill was full, so he gave the rest of his food to John. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct