In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Tom threw his schoolbag down to Ray after he reached the top of the stairs.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to tom because , as we've seen, he's the one who was in possession of the 'he' from. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of steel.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the large ball because it took the entire table in its path. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Tom threw his schoolbag down to Ray after he reached the top of the stairs.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to tom because Ray was lower than Tom therefore Tom must be throwing the schoolbag down. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Correct