In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: I took the water bottle out of the backpack so that it would be handy.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the water bottle because Taking the water bottle out would make it more handy as oppose to having no effect on the handiness of the backpack. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: Beth didn't get angry with Sally, who had cut her off, because she stopped and counted to ten.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to beth because Sally apologizing is why beth didn't get angry. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because the red should refer to the humans. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****