In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: John ordered Bill to leave, so an hour later he left.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bill because Bill was being ordered to leave. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: Paul tried to call George on the phone, but he wasn't available.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because he was at the hospital for an hour or so. He was taken to the hospital by ambulance. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Dan took the rear seat while Bill claimed the front because his "Dibs!" was quicker.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to bill because he was originally supposed to have the 'Dibs!' position, however this was not completed. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Correct
****