In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Jim signaled the barman and gestured toward his empty glass
 Reason: The 'his' refers to jim because he was a very 'in' character. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Ann asked Mary what time the library closes, because she had forgotten.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to ann because all info is waiting to be gotten from mary so she is the she. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Fred and Alice had very warm down coats, but they were not enough for the cold in Alaska.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to coats because fred and alice are the ones with the warm coats and aren't still ready for the weather. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong