In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Mark told Pete many lies about himself, which Pete included in his book. He should have been more  truthful.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to mark because The lies were included in the book Pete wrote; therefore Paul was the one untruthful. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: George got free tickets to the play, but he gave them to Eric, even though he was particularly eager to see it.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because because he was particularly eager to see it so  George got free tickets to the play, but he gave them to Eric. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: If the con artist has succeeded in fooling Sam, he would have lost a lot of money.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sam because he did wrong thing and got lost. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Correct