In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't use it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the path because it runs through a large portion of the game, and is likely to be the final path we use. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Wrong

Sentence: The actress used to be named Terpsichore, but she changed it to Tina a  few years ago, because she figured it was too hard to pronounce.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to terpsichore because it's a good name for a young girl, and also because as a writer, she's not. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Wrong

Sentence: Everyone really loved the oatmeal cookies; only a few people liked the  chocolate chip cookies. Next time, we should make fewer of them .
 Reason: The 'them' refers to the chocolate chip cookies because they are not a single cookie but more like a bowl of cookies. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Wrong