In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't use it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the path because it runs through a large portion of the game, and is likely to be the final path we use. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: George got free tickets to the play, but he gave them to Eric, even though he was particularly eager to see it.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because he was the one who first mentioned the play on September 27, 1993. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Frank was upset with Tom because the toaster he had bought from him didn't work.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to frank because he was the one who 'lost' the toaster, the one who couldn't figure out how. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong