In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: I saw Jim yelling at some guy in a military uniform with a huge red  beard. I don't know why he was, but he looked very unhappy.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to jim because yelling comes from unhappy person. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: The drain is clogged with hair. It has to be cleaned.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the drain because It has to be cleaned. but The drain is clogged with hair. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: I couldn't put the pot on the shelf because it was too tall.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pot because The pot is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Correct
****