In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: The firemen arrived before the police because they were coming from so far away.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the police because only the police could have pulled the firemen out of the burning building. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Joe's uncle can still beat him at tennis, even though he is 30 years older.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to joe's uncle because because it is unusual that he would lose. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: The sun was covered by a thick cloud all morning, but luckily, by the time the picnic started, it was out.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the sun because We speak of the sun coming out, not clouds. It would not usually be considered lucky for clouds to appear at a picnic. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct