TASK DEFINITION: In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
PROBLEM: Sentence: Jim signaled the barman and gestured toward his bathroom key.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to the barman because JIM REFER TO THA BARMAN. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Wrong

PROBLEM: Sentence: Dan had to stop Bill from toying with the injured bird. He is very compassionate.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to dan because he is actually a 'he' in the first place, but he might be referring to his partner. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Wrong

PROBLEM: Sentence: When Tommy dropped his ice cream, Timmy giggled, so father gave him a sympathetic look.
 Reason: The 'him' refers to tommy because Timmy giggled at what Tommy dropped and father gave him a warning. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION:
Wrong