In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Bob collapsed on the sidewalk. Soon he saw Carl coming to help. He was very ill.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to bob because The red should refer to Carl as being the concerned one. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The dog chased the cat, which ran up a tree. It waited at the top.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cat because the cat is on the tree, and it is not at the bottom. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The city councilmen refused the demonstrators a permit because they feared violence.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the city councilmen because The demonstrators made the councilmen feared violence. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct