In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Sam's drawing was hung just above Tina's and it did look much better with another one below it.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to sam's drawing because Tina's drawing was hng below Sam's and that made Sam's drawing look much better with another one below it. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: John hired Bill to take care of him .
 Reason: The 'him' refers to john because Bill is the closest thing that has been established to whom John actually is, and it was Bill who. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Sam pulled up a chair to the piano, but it was broken, so he had to sing instead.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the piano because she chair was broken so she has no choice to sit other than stand. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong