In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: We had hoped to place copies of our newsletter on all the chairs in the auditorium, but there were simply too many of them .
 Reason: The 'them' refers to chairs because They said on all the chairs making it known that they are referring to the newsletter copies as what they don't have enough. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: I'm sure that my map will show this building; it is very famous.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the building because famous buildings can be landmarks. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: Lily spoke to Donna, breaking her concentration.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to donna because of her relationship with Lily and her role in the investigation. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong