In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: Pete envies Martin although he is very successful.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to pete because , as a former 'he', Martin has a special status among some in the business. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: Sam's drawing was hung just above Tina's and it did look much better with another one below it.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to sam's drawing because Tina's drawing was hng below Sam's and that made Sam's drawing look much better with another one below it. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: I was trying to open the lock with the key, but someone had filled the  keyhole with chewing gum, and I couldn't get it in.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the key because I was trying to open the lock with the key, but someone had filled the keyhole. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Correct