In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because there is a long line of minnows in the water. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Carol believed that Rebecca suspected that she had stolen the watch.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to carol because Carol believed that Rebecca regretted. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Frank felt vindicated when his longtime rival Bill revealed that he was the winner of the competition.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to frank because Frank was vindicated: therefore he must have one. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Correct
****