In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Sam tried to paint a picture of shepherds with sheep, but they ended up looking more like golfers.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the shepherds because they're so similar to the 'golfer' that it's hard to miss. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: There is a gap in the wall. You can see the garden behind it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the wall because it was built on land the garden was on. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because journalists are persistent in interviewing. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct