In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Sentence: Adam can't leave work here until Bob arrives to replace him. If Bob had  left home for work on time, he would be gone by this time.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to adam because he's the one who is left behind. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Wrong

Sentence: I put the butterfly wing on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the butterfly wing because the books most likley would not have broken the table. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Wrong

Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because YAKUTSK REFER TO KAMTCHATKA. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Wrong