In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it had a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the carrot because They stabbed the carrot. Logically a hole would be left. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: Dr. Adams informed Kate that she had cancer and presented several options for future treatment.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to kate because the doctor used the pronoun 'she' in the video. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Since it was raining, I carried the newspaper over my backpack to keep it dry.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the backpack because it was covered in a thin layer of sodden rain, which made it look like a wet. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****