In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it had a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the carrot because They stabbed the carrot. Logically a hole would be left. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: Susan knew that Ann's son had been in a car accident, because she told her about it.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to ann because 'she' is an important part of the story and the 'he' might refer to the son. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: I used an old rag to clean the knife, and then I put it in the trash.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the rag because Actually, the red pronoun "it" must refer to the knife, which you would put away in a drawer, rather than the rag, which you would not. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Wrong