In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Jim comforted Kevin because he was so upset.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to kevin because he was the primary victim of the crime. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she couldn't stand her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to the trainer because she has been publicly linked to a man named John Rizzo. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The fish ate the worm. It was hungry.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the fish because hunger makes fish predators. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct