In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education, but now Charlie acts as though it never happened. He is very ungrateful.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to charlie because Charlie is the one who acts like it never happened. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: As Ollie carried Tommy up the long winding steps, his legs dangled.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to tommy because Tommy is being carried, so his legs most likely would not be aching. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Fred is the only man still alive who remembers my great-grandfather. He is a remarkable man.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to fred because was is past tense and suggests it is talking about the great-grandfather who is no longer alive. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong?
Output: Wrong