In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Dan took the rear seat while Bill claimed the front because his "Dibs!" was quicker.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to bill because bill claimed front but dan is took seat. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: As Andrea in the crop duster passed over Susan, she could see the landing gear.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to susan because Andrea, being in the plane, can't see the landing gear from her position. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Frank felt crushed when his longtime rival Bill revealed that he was the winner of the competition.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bill because they have both been in the same position before, and the 'they' is likely to refer to. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong