TASK DEFINITION: In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
PROBLEM: Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she couldn't stand her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to the trainer because she has been publicly linked to a man named John Rizzo. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Wrong

PROBLEM: Sentence: The sculpture rolled off the shelf because it wasn't anchored.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the sculpture because The sculpture moved easily because nothing was holding it in place. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Correct

PROBLEM: Sentence: The sack of potatoes had been placed below the bag of flour, so it had to be moved first.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the bag of flour because The flour is on top of the potatoes. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION:
Correct