In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Sam pulled up a chair to the piano, but it was broken, so he had to sing instead.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the piano because it was broken, so he had to stand instead but  Sam pulled up a chair to the piano. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Jane knocked on the door, and Susan answered it. She invited her to come out.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to jane because her mother is Jane's mother, and because Jane can't remember the name of the person who gave. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: I can't cut that tree down with that axe; it is too small.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the axe because MORE LIKELY TO REFER THAT TREE. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****