In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Jane knocked on Susan's door, but there was no answer. She was disappointed.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to jane because Jane was the one that got no answer at the door so it's logical she was disappointed. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: I used an old rag to clean the knife, and then I put it in the drawer.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the knife because it is the primary tool in the game, and the 'it' in the game refers to the. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Jane knocked on Susan's door, but there was no answer. She was disappointed.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to jane because Jane was the one that got no answer at the door so it's logical she was disappointed. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct