In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: Mary tucked her daughter Anne into bed, so that she could sleep.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to mary's daughter because anne was tucked by her mother so that anne slept. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: The fish ate the worm. It was hungry.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the fish because it is the only one that could eat the worm. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: Sam pulled up a chair to the piano, but it was broken, so he had to stand instead.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the chair because it is the only one that was in the room when he arrived, but in the previous episode,. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Wrong