We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From what i've seen in the wild, targets that, in make, would be marked .PHONY aren't anything special in the eyes of redo.
.PHONY
redo
They're just run with redo, while their dependencies would be run with redo-ifchange.
redo-ifchange
What happens if a file with the same name exists? If used with redo, there's no problem, but if used with redo-ifchange, nothing is run.
Distinguishing real, phony, and "virtual" (multi-output) targets might help:
redo-targets -p
p
.do
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
From what i've seen in the wild, targets that, in make, would be marked
.PHONY
aren't anything special in the eyes ofredo
.They're just run with
redo
, while their dependencies would be run withredo-ifchange
.What happens if a file with the same name exists? If used with
redo
, there's no problem, but if used withredo-ifchange
, nothing is run.Distinguishing real, phony, and "virtual" (multi-output) targets might help:
redo-targets -p
(p
for phony) could be run; and.do
files?)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: