New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rust 1.15.0 #9582

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
from

Conversation

6 participants
@mrageh
Contributor

mrageh commented Feb 2, 2017

  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
  • Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install <formula>)?

@ilovezfs

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ilovezfs

ilovezfs Feb 3, 2017

Contributor

Neither racer nor cargo bootstrap have been updated.

Contributor

ilovezfs commented Feb 3, 2017

Neither racer nor cargo bootstrap have been updated.

@ilovezfs ilovezfs changed the title from rust 1.15 to rust 1.15.0 Feb 3, 2017

@ilovezfs

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ilovezfs

ilovezfs Feb 3, 2017

Contributor

I've updated the cargo bootstrap and the racer version in the PR. Note that the revision for the cargo bootstrap is found in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.15.0/src/stage0.txt

Contributor

ilovezfs commented Feb 3, 2017

I've updated the cargo bootstrap and the racer version in the PR. Note that the revision for the cargo bootstrap is found in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.15.0/src/stage0.txt

@ilovezfs ilovezfs removed the do not merge label Feb 3, 2017

@ilovezfs ilovezfs closed this in d7ee823 Feb 3, 2017

@ilovezfs

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ilovezfs

ilovezfs Feb 3, 2017

Contributor

@mrageh thanks for your contribution to Homebrew!

Contributor

ilovezfs commented Feb 3, 2017

@mrageh thanks for your contribution to Homebrew!

@fukamachi

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fukamachi

fukamachi Feb 9, 2017

Contributor

Is the SHA256 for rustc tarball correct?

brew install --with-racer rust
==> Using the sandbox
==> Downloading https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-1.15.0-src.tar.gz
######################################################################## 100.0%
Error: SHA256 mismatch
Expected: 33f3747d231ede34b56c6cc0ae6be8cbaa29d2fdb39d86f25693dceb9fc5f164
Actual: f655e4fac9c2abb93eb579e29c408e46052c0e74b7655cd222c63c6743457673
Archive: /Users/nitro_idiot/Library/Caches/Homebrew/rust-1.15.0.tar.gz
To retry an incomplete download, remove the file above.
Contributor

fukamachi commented Feb 9, 2017

Is the SHA256 for rustc tarball correct?

brew install --with-racer rust
==> Using the sandbox
==> Downloading https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-1.15.0-src.tar.gz
######################################################################## 100.0%
Error: SHA256 mismatch
Expected: 33f3747d231ede34b56c6cc0ae6be8cbaa29d2fdb39d86f25693dceb9fc5f164
Actual: f655e4fac9c2abb93eb579e29c408e46052c0e74b7655cd222c63c6743457673
Archive: /Users/nitro_idiot/Library/Caches/Homebrew/rust-1.15.0.tar.gz
To retry an incomplete download, remove the file above.
@JCount

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@JCount

JCount Feb 9, 2017

Member

@fukamachi They appear to have re-uploaded/modified the source tarball today, which is a bit troubling. I will try and look into this.

Member

JCount commented Feb 9, 2017

@fukamachi They appear to have re-uploaded/modified the source tarball today, which is a bit troubling. I will try and look into this.

@JCount

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@JCount

JCount Feb 9, 2017

Member

CC @alexcrichton Any idea what might have happened here?

Member

JCount commented Feb 9, 2017

CC @alexcrichton Any idea what might have happened here?

@alexcrichton

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@alexcrichton

alexcrichton Feb 9, 2017

Contributor

@JCount we've been having some infrastructure hiccups unfortunately and we think we may have accidentally overwritten some artifacts. Sorry if that's causing any problems! I can confirm though that f655e4fac9c2abb93eb579e29c408e46052c0e74b7655cd222c63c6743457673 is now the current correct sha256 of the source tarball.

Contributor

alexcrichton commented Feb 9, 2017

@JCount we've been having some infrastructure hiccups unfortunately and we think we may have accidentally overwritten some artifacts. Sorry if that's causing any problems! I can confirm though that f655e4fac9c2abb93eb579e29c408e46052c0e74b7655cd222c63c6743457673 is now the current correct sha256 of the source tarball.

@JCount

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@JCount

JCount Feb 9, 2017

Member

@alexcrichton Thank you for the clarification!

Member

JCount commented Feb 9, 2017

@alexcrichton Thank you for the clarification!

@JCount JCount referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2017

Closed

rust: fix checksum #9778

@brson

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@brson

brson Feb 10, 2017

As an update, for now we are not planning on taking any actions to correct this mistake. The source tarball for 1.15.0 will remain as it is now, after the re-publication. I'm sorry for the trouble, please contact me or @alexcrichton if this turns out to be a problem.

brson commented Feb 10, 2017

As an update, for now we are not planning on taking any actions to correct this mistake. The source tarball for 1.15.0 will remain as it is now, after the re-publication. I'm sorry for the trouble, please contact me or @alexcrichton if this turns out to be a problem.

@Homebrew Homebrew locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2018

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.