libmarpa 8.6.2 (new formula)

[dabrahams]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

note: formula cookbook doesn't advise --strict for new formulas, but that finds more issues and appears to be required per above. Also it advises using --new-formula instead of --new.

[carlocab]

Why do we need to use :nounzip?

[dabrahams]

To reproduce the build directory structure recommended by the library's HOWTO document

[carlocab]

Also it advises using --new-formula instead of --new.

--new-formula is synonymous with --new.

[dabrahams]

w.r.t. --new-formula vs --new, they may be synonyms, but not everyone will know that, and having supposedly followed all the directions they've been given, will be frustrated that they're being asked by the PR template to run a different audit command.

[dabrahams]

Bump. Have my responses to review comments been satisfactory? I'd like to know if there's anything else I need to do to get this formula accepted.

Thanks!

[SMillerDev]

Thanks @dabrahams ! Without contributions like yours it'd be impossible to keep homebrew going with the high standards that users have come to expect from the project. You can feel good knowing that you've made the world a tiny bit better for homebrew users around the world! 👍 🎉

[BrewTestBot]

@SMillerDev has triggered a merge.