Skip to content

HumanCompatibleAI/evaluating-rewards

master
Switch branches/tags
Code

Latest commit

 

Git stats

Files

Permalink
Failed to load latest commit information.
Type
Name
Latest commit message
Commit time
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

CircleCI codecov

Evaluating Rewards

evaluating_rewards is a library to compare and evaluate reward functions. The accompanying paper, Quantifying Differences in Reward Functions, describes the methods implemented in this repository.

Getting Started

Installation

To install evaluating_rewards, clone the repository and run:

pip install evaluating_rewards/

To install in developer mode so that edits will be immediately available:

pip install -e evaluating_rewards/

The package is compatible with Python 3.6 and upwards. There is no support for Python 2.

Computing EPIC Distance

The evaluating_rewards.analysis.dissimilarity_heatmaps.plot_epic_heatmap script provides a convenient front-end to generate heatmaps of EPIC distance between reward models. For example, to replicate Figure 2(a) from the paper, simply run:

python -m evaluating_rewards.analysis.dissimilarity_heatmaps.plot_epic_heatmap with point_mass paper
# If you want higher precision results like the paper (warning: will take several hours), use:
# python -m evaluating_rewards.analysis.dissimilarity_heatmaps.plot_epic_heatmap with point_mass paper high_precision 

plot_epic_heatmap uses the evaluating_rewards.epic_sample module to compute the EPIC distance. You may wish to use this module directly, for example when integrating EPIC into an existing evaluation suite. Check out this notebook for an example of how to use epic_sample.

Technical Structure

evaluating_rewards consists of:

  • the main package, containing some reward learning algorithms and distance methods. In particular:
    • epic_sample.py contains the implementation of EPIC.
    • rewards.py and comparisons.py define deep reward models and associated comparison methods, and tabular.py the equivalent in a tabular (finite-state) setting.
    • serialize.py loads reward models, both from this package and other projects.
  • envs, a sub-package defining some simple environments and associated hard-coded reward models and (in some cases) policies.
  • experiments, a sub-package defining helper methods supporting experiments we have performed.

Obtaining Reward Models

To use evaluating_rewards, you will need to have some reward models to compare. We provide native support to load reward models output by imitation, an open-source implementation of AIRL and GAIL. It is also simple to add new formats to serialize.py.

Reproducing the Paper

Note in addition to the Python requirements, you will need to install GNU Parallel to run these bash scripts, for example with sudo apt-get parallel.

By default results will be saved to $HOME/output; set the EVAL_OUTPUT_ROOT environment variable to override this.

Distance Between Hand-Designed Reward Functions

To replicate the results in section 6.1 "Comparing hand-designed reward functions", run:

./runners/comparison/hardcoded_npec.sh
./runners/comparison/hardcoded_figs.sh

The first script, hardcoded_npec.sh, computes the NPEC distance between the hand-designed reward functions. This is relatively slow since it requires training a deep network.

The second script, hardcoded_figs, plots the EPIC, NPEC and ERC heatmaps. For NPEC, the distances precomputed by the first script are used. For EPIC and ERC they are computed on demand since the distances are relatively cheap to compute.

The distances in gridworlds are produced by a separate script, exploiting the tabular nature of the problem. Run:

# NPEC
python -m evaluating_rewards.analysis.dissimilarity_heatmaps.plot_gridworld_heatmap with paper
# EPIC
python -m evaluating_rewards.analysis.dissimilarity_heatmaps.plot_gridworld_heatmap with paper kind=fully_connected_random_canonical_direct

Distance of Learned Reward Model to Ground Truth

To replicate the results in section 6.2 "Predicting policy performance from reward distance" and section 6.3 "Sensitivity of reward distance to visitation state distribution", you should run:

./runners/transfer_point_maze.sh
python -m evaluating_rewards.scripts.pipeline.combined_distances with point_maze_learned_good high_precision

The first script, transfer_point_maze.sh, 0) trains a synthetic expert policy using RL on the ground-truth reward; 1) trains reward models via IRL on demonstrations from this expert, and via preference comparison and regression with labels from the ground-truth reward; 2a) computes NPEC distance of these rewards from the ground-truth; 2b) trains policies using RL on the learned reward models; 3) evaluates the resulting policies.

The second script, combined_distances, generates a table and also computes the EPIC and ERC distances of the learned reward models from the ground truth.

License

This library is licensed under the terms of the Apache license. See LICENSE for more information.

DeepMind holds the copyright to all work prior to October 4th, during the lead author's (Adam Gleave) internship at DeepMind. Subsequent modifications conducted at UC Berkeley are copyright of the author. Disclaimer: This is not an officially supported Google or DeepMind product.

About

Library to compare and evaluate reward functions

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages