-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Add support for VolumeAccessPoint(FileShareTarget Creation) if volume creation fails but creates (File share) #81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…hare creation fails Signed-off-by: Sameer Shaikh <sameer.shaikh@ibm.com>
|
👍 Coverage increased from [%] to [82.7875%] |
|
👍 Coverage increased from [%] to [83.3%] |
…hare creation fails Signed-off-by: Sameer Shaikh <sameer.shaikh@ibm.com>
|
👍 Coverage increased from [%] to [83%] |
…hare creation fails Signed-off-by: Sameer Shaikh <sameer.shaikh@ibm.com>
|
👍 Coverage increased from [%] to [%] |
1 similar comment
|
👍 Coverage increased from [%] to [%] |
Signed-off-by: Sameer Shaikh <sameer.shaikh@ibm.com>
|
👍 Coverage increased from [%] to [82.875%] |
Signed-off-by: Sameer Shaikh <sameer.shaikh@ibm.com>
|
👍 Coverage increased from [%] to [82.675%] |
Signed-off-by: Sameer Shaikh <sameer.shaikh@ibm.com>
|
👍 Coverage increased from [%] to [83.3125%] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Signed-off-by: Sameer Shaikh <sameer.shaikh@ibm.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
|
👍 Coverage increased from [%] to [83.1%] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
If for some reason the File share is created but target creation fails. Lets retry creating target so that we have way to recover the file share created.
Results : https://github.ibm.com/alchemy-containers/armada-storage/issues/6106