Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prezi 3 / Image 2 requires id and @id :( #1064

Closed
azaroth42 opened this Issue Feb 13, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@azaroth42
Copy link
Member

azaroth42 commented Feb 13, 2017

Document this in the Presentation API.

@azaroth42 azaroth42 added this to the Presentation 3.0 milestone Mar 8, 2017

@azaroth42

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

azaroth42 commented Jun 14, 2017

Related to #518 about cross-version weirdness

@ndushay

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

ndushay commented Jun 27, 2017

yes, yes it does. bumped into this. 😿

@azaroth42

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

azaroth42 commented Sep 5, 2017

Noting that this is a worse scenario than the rights / license issue, as for that one (#644) there are two explicit context definitions. Here we have an alias (id), and nothing (raw use of @id) ... so the alias will always trump the lack of a definition. This doesn't matter for consumption via JSON-LD aware processors, but it will prevent the creation of the right JSON by a JSON-LD based toolchain -- the compaction will always prefer the id form, and you can't "unset" it.

@azaroth42

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

azaroth42 commented Sep 28, 2017

As there's nothing we can do to solve this, re-tagging as editorial.

@azaroth42

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

azaroth42 commented Nov 3, 2017

I've raised the issue for JSON-LD 1.1 to allow explicitly zeroing out a context definition:
json-ld/json-ld.org#546

@azaroth42 azaroth42 self-assigned this Nov 13, 2017

@azaroth42 azaroth42 added review and removed in progress labels Nov 13, 2017

@azaroth42 azaroth42 removed the +x-version label Nov 22, 2017

@azaroth42

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

azaroth42 commented Jan 4, 2018

Closed by #1301

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.