New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop "full" size #678

Closed
jpstroop opened this Issue Dec 22, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@jpstroop
Member

jpstroop commented Dec 22, 2015

@azaroth42

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@azaroth42

azaroth42 Jan 13, 2016

Member

👍 to killing full in 3.0

Member

azaroth42 commented Jan 13, 2016

👍 to killing full in 3.0

@mikeapp

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mikeapp

mikeapp Jan 13, 2016

Member

👍 to killing full

Member

mikeapp commented Jan 13, 2016

👍 to killing full

@tomcrane

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@tomcrane

tomcrane Jan 13, 2016

Contributor

👍

Contributor

tomcrane commented Jan 13, 2016

👍

@zimeon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@zimeon

zimeon Jan 13, 2016

Member

👍 to deprecating full as of 2.1 and killing in 3.0

Member

zimeon commented Jan 13, 2016

👍 to deprecating full as of 2.1 and killing in 3.0

@zimeon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@zimeon

zimeon Oct 20, 2016

Member

Discussion at The Hague, syntax will change from /full/full/0/default to '/full/max/0/default`, servers might well redirect anyway. Might be useful to note the history in the 3.0 spec

Member

zimeon commented Oct 20, 2016

Discussion at The Hague, syntax will change from /full/full/0/default to '/full/max/0/default`, servers might well redirect anyway. Might be useful to note the history in the 3.0 spec

@jpstroop

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jpstroop

jpstroop Jan 31, 2018

Member

Consensus on 31 Jan 2018 community call is that this is still OK. This + resolution of #693 solves #1370

Member

jpstroop commented Jan 31, 2018

Consensus on 31 Jan 2018 community call is that this is still OK. This + resolution of #693 solves #1370

@azaroth42 azaroth42 removed the discuss label Feb 9, 2018

@azaroth42 azaroth42 referenced this issue Feb 20, 2018

Merged

full -> max #1422

@azaroth42

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@azaroth42

azaroth42 Feb 20, 2018

Member

closed by #1422

Member

azaroth42 commented Feb 20, 2018

closed by #1422

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment