Skip to content

Conversation

@emstoudenmire
Copy link
Contributor

In response to this forum post, this PR changes the initial state for the METTS example code to be a product state, similar to the other initial states later in the algorithm to avoid potential confusion. It also adds printing of each sampled product state while the algorithm runs.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2025

Your PR no longer requires formatting changes. Thank you for your contribution!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 9, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.29%. Comparing base (c01cba6) to head (fb1f9c3).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #165   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.29%   90.29%           
=======================================
  Files          54       54           
  Lines        3605     3605           
=======================================
  Hits         3255     3255           
  Misses        350      350           
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 18.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit b94c4bc into main Nov 10, 2025
14 checks passed
@mtfishman mtfishman deleted the metts_improvements branch November 10, 2025 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants