[EXPERIMENT] [Builtins] 10x more builtins #6502
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
effectfully
added
Do not merge
Builtins
EXPERIMENT
Contributor
Author
|
/benchmark validation |
Contributor
Author
|
/benchmark nofib |
Contributor
Author
|
/benchmark lists |
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '4b372ecea' (base) and '9fbb994eb' (PR) Results table
|
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
Author
|
That doesn't make any sense:
|
Contributor
Author
|
/benchmark validation |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'nofib' on '4b372ecea' (base) and '9fbb994eb' (PR) Results table
|
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'lists' on '4b372ecea' (base) and '9fbb994eb' (PR) Results table
|
Contributor
Author
|
/benchmark validation |
2 similar comments
Contributor
Author
|
/benchmark validation |
Contributor
Author
|
/benchmark validation |
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '4b372ecea' (base) and '9fbb994eb' (PR) Results table
|
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '4b372ecea' (base) and '9fbb994eb' (PR) Results table
|
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '4b372ecea' (base) and '9fbb994eb' (PR) Results table
|
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '4b372ecea' (base) and '9fbb994eb' (PR) Results table
|
Contributor
Author
Yup, the benchmarking machine is cooked as it turns out (confirmed elsewhere). Well, gotta wait for it to recover. |
Contributor
Author
|
/benchmark validation-full |
1 similar comment
Contributor
Author
|
/benchmark validation-full |
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
Author
|
/benchmark validation-full |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation-decode' on 'edcb89629b' (base) and 'c5bb3ac926' (PR) Results table
|
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation-full' on 'edcb89629b' (base) and 'c5bb3ac926' (PR) Results table
|
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation-full' on 'edcb89629b' (base) and 'c5bb3ac926' (PR) Results table
|
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation-full' on 'edcb89629b' (base) and 'c5bb3ac926' (PR) Results table
|
…to effectfully/experiment/builtins/10x-more-builtins
effectfully
temporarily deployed
to
github-pages
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Contributor
Author
|
/benchmark validation |
1 similar comment
Contributor
Author
|
/benchmark validation |
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '0effd6cae' (base) and '48616b60b' (PR) Results table
|
Contributor
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Contributor
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '0effd6cae' (base) and '48616b60b' (PR) Results table
|
Contributor
Author
|
Experiment over, this weirdness needs to be investigated, maybe we already pay some unnecessary costs. Made a subticket in #4306:
|
effectfully
deleted the
effectfully/experiment/builtins/10x-more-builtins
branch
effectfully
restored the
effectfully/experiment/builtins/10x-more-builtins
branch
Contributor
Author
|
The conflicts don't seem too bad, we should rerun the benchmarks once the issue of misleading benchmarking is fixed before this branch bitrots any further. |
effectfully
deleted the
effectfully/experiment/builtins/10x-more-builtins
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This replicates the existing builtins so that there are 10x of them now. This is just to check whether it results in any evaluation slowdown.