Skip to content
Permalink
Branch: master
Find file Copy path
Find file Copy path
Fetching contributors…
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
47 lines (31 sloc) 1.87 KB

Use slf4j together with log4j2 for logging

Context and Problem Statement

Up to version 4.1 JabRef uses apache-commons-logging 1.2 for logging errors and messages. However, this is not compatible with java 9 and is superseded by log4j.

Decision Drivers

  • SLF4J provides a façade for several logging frameworks, including log4j and supports already java 9
  • Log4j is already defined as dependency and slf4j has already been required by a third party dependency

Considered Alternatives

Decision Outcome

Chosen option: "SLF4J with Log4j2 binding", because comes out best (see below).

Pros and Cons of the Options

Log4j2

  • Good, because dependency already exists
  • Good, because Java 9 support since version 2.10
  • Bad, because direct dependency

SLF4J with log4j2 binding

  • Good, because it only requires minimal changes to our logging infrastructure
  • Good, because Apache Log4j 2 is an upgrade to Log4j that provides significant improvements over its predecessor, Log4j 1.x, and provides many of the improvements available in Logback while fixing some inherent problems in Logback’s architecture.
  • Good, because supports other loggers as well
  • Good, because Java 9 support
  • Good, because already defined
  • Good, because migration tool available
  • Good, because it is a façade for several loggers. Thus, the underlying implementation can easily be changed in the future.
  • Bad, because logger statements require a slight different syntax

SLF4J with Logback binding

  • Good, because migration tool available
  • Good, because native implementation of slf4j
  • Bad, because Java 9 support only available in alpha
  • Bad, because different syntax than log4j/commons logging
You can’t perform that action at this time.