Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate all maintained plugins into JabRef #152

Closed
koppor opened this issue Sep 9, 2015 · 9 comments
Closed

Integrate all maintained plugins into JabRef #152

koppor opened this issue Sep 9, 2015 · 9 comments

Comments

@koppor
Copy link
Member

@koppor koppor commented Sep 9, 2015

The plugin system of JabRef used the Java Plug-in Framework, which is not state of the art anymore. The modern way is to use Jigsaw. However, offering a plugin interface requires the interfaces to be stable. This cannot be guaranteed. Issues such as korv/Jabref-plugins#13 or lehner/LocalCopy#6 will arise. We assume that plugin functionality directly integrated in the JabRef code will ensure that it will be maintained, we removed the plugin functionality.

We ask all plugin developers to fork JabRef, integrate the plugin functionality and create a pull request. Our CONTRIBUTING.md file provides details.

In the long run, all available plugins should be integrated in JabRef.

@jdpipe
Copy link

@jdpipe jdpipe commented Jan 6, 2016

Hi there

Does this also affect jabref-ooplugin?
http://jabref.sourceforge.net/OOPlugin-jabref.php

I still use this regularly, and hope that it can continue to be supported.

Cheers
JP

@simonharrer
Copy link
Contributor

@simonharrer simonharrer commented Jan 7, 2016

The OO plugin is still supported as it is integrated into JabRef directly. No need to worry. :)

@oscargus
Copy link
Contributor

@oscargus oscargus commented Feb 4, 2016

I just found this plugin: https://github.com/kwwette/pdftasks which seems quite useful as far as I can tell. It is rather recently updated and relies on the file-field rather than the pdf-field. Should we ask the author if he could integrate it?

@oscargus
Copy link
Contributor

@oscargus oscargus commented Feb 4, 2016

Oh, now I saw kwwette/pdftasks#1 ... Still, the impression is that this plugin makes things a bit more intuitive compared to running a cleanup. Also, this could be used as a starting point to extract additional information from PDFs etc.

@dajare
Copy link

@dajare dajare commented Feb 18, 2016

I'm new to JabRef, and a bit confused about how things are going in this transition phase (as it appears to be). I'm using JabRef 3.2, but wanting/needing to use some custom export filters. These exist as "plugins":

  • net.sf.jabref.export.Chicago(English)-1.2.jar
  • net.sf.jabref.export.Turabian(English)-1.2.jar

These are available from the old resources page. Is there a way to make use of these old plugins in 3.2?

(+ Apologies if this is the wrong place for this: I got here via a link in the mailing list.)

@mlep
Copy link
Contributor

@mlep mlep commented Apr 21, 2016

@koppor Could you update the checkbox, as the list of plugins is listed in the FAQ (http://www.jabref.org/faq/)?

@tobiasdiez
Copy link
Member

@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez commented Sep 27, 2016

I marked the ADS fetcher plugins as done since we now have search by query and search by id as fetcher, which was exactly the purpose of these ADS plugins.

@tobiasdiez
Copy link
Member

@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez commented Oct 29, 2016

@koppor koppor mentioned this issue Nov 18, 2016
1 of 6 tasks complete
@tobiasdiez
Copy link
Member

@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez commented Sep 8, 2018

Since plugin support is now gone for three years and we have got no user inquires asking us to include the remaining plugins, I'll close this issue now. Pullrequests that include some of the functionality of the old plugins are of course still more than welcome.

@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez closed this Sep 8, 2018
@koppor koppor added the freeze label Mar 6, 2020
@koppor koppor mentioned this issue Mar 6, 2020
4 of 4 tasks complete
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
8 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.