Skip to content

Conversation

@koppor
Copy link
Member

@koppor koppor commented Aug 3, 2025

We should use https

Mandatory checks

  • I own the copyright of the code submitted and I license it under the MIT license
  • Change in CHANGELOG.md described in a way that is understandable for the average user (if change is visible to the user)
  • [/] Tests created for changes (if applicable)
  • [/] Manually tested changed features in running JabRef (always required)
  • [/] Screenshots added in PR description (if change is visible to the user)
  • [/] Checked developer's documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I outlined it in this pull request.
  • [/] Checked documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I created an issue at https://github.com/JabRef/user-documentation/issues or, even better, I submitted a pull request to the documentation repository.

@trag-bot
Copy link

trag-bot bot commented Aug 3, 2025

@trag-bot didn't find any issues in the code! ✅✨

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 2a2a343 Aug 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr deleted the use-https branch August 3, 2025 12:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants