Hence, it is difficult for potential users to see what JabRef looks like before making their decision to try it.
I believe we need to add up-to-date screenshots in an visible place.
Do you agree?
In such a case:
Place: mainly jabref.org
OS: at least one for each operating system (windows, linux, Mac OSX)
What: not sure, to keep it simple I would suggest focusing on the most important use case: having a library loaded in the default configuration, and editing an entry.
Good idea to add screenshots. I would manly make screenshots of windows which are at least somewhat visually appealing. There should be images for every 2-3 features listed on jabref.org. I like the integration of screenshots and text on xamarin.
@matthiasgeiger You made the screenshots for https://sourceforge.net/projects/jabref/. Do you think, it's possible to migrate them? Could you take care?
"Migrate" to v3.2 or place them on jabref.org?
The latter would require some time as I am not firm with those jekyll templating system and how to add js libs etc. to show the screenshots nicely...
BTW, I can make screenshot for Linux, when needed.
@matthiasgeiger If you have the HTML code, I can easily integrate it in the homepage.
We should make the screnshots reproducible. The JabRef settings and the bib file should be versioned somewhere. Proposal: https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/tree/master/src/test/resources/screenshots. Alternatively, we could version them here in the master branch. This is possibly less confusing.
@matthiasgeiger Just put "screenshots.html" in the root in the gh-pages branch and I can integrate that snippet into the layout.
Might be a good work for friday afternoon ;-)
About reproducible screenshots:
Maybe they could also be useful to ensure JabRef compatibility during its development?
@mlep: Could you please add the links to https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/wiki/Publicly-available-BibTeX-files?
I think, we should create our own bib file showing the most features of JabRef.
Can the new GUI tests be used to make screenshots? Then we could automatically create up-to-date shoots after every release.
I looked at the website and I have a few additional comments:
All of these points are all pretty small issues, but if I was looking for a citation database manager, they could easily be dealbreakers for me. That said, I quite like the design of the website...
@andlaus: relevant points! Regarding the developer mailing list we decided to abandon it a few days ago as it is not used anyway (all discussions are here on GitHub). (I would assume that the persons working more actively on the website take your input into consideration. Small but clearly relevant and easy to fix.)
I close this issue as we have screenshots.
@andlaus Your comments will be noted elsewhere to keep this issue tracker clean.
@andlaus Thank you for the gmane pointer, we will move away from mailinglists to discourse: http://discourse.jabref.org/