Skip to content

perf: add application service benchmark results #343

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
JerrettDavis merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2026
Merged

perf: add application service benchmark results #343

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -470,6 +470,8 @@ BenchmarkDotNet guidance is documented in [docs/guides/benchmarks.md](docs/guide
| Cache-Aside | Execution | 216.50 ns | 1,048 B | 208.60 ns | 1,048 B | Same allocation; generated was slightly faster for the miss-then-hit workflow. |
| Data Mapper | Construction | 40.56 ns | 288 B | 12.87 ns | 112 B | Generated reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Data Mapper | Execution | 188.09 ns | 1,104 B | 97.71 ns | 672 B | Generated reduced execution time and allocation for the map-store-load workflow. |
| Domain Event | Construction | 199.5 ns | 1.34 KB | 157.6 ns | 1.04 KB | Generated reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Domain Event | Execution | 367.2 ns | 1.77 KB | 346.4 ns | 1.55 KB | Generated reduced execution time and allocation for the order-placed dispatch workflow. |
| Leader Election | Construction | 14.28 ns | 104 B | 15.91 ns | 104 B | Same allocation; fluent was slightly faster in this microbenchmark. |
| Leader Election | Execution | 43.62 ns | 360 B | 144.37 ns | 312 B | Generated allocated about 13% less memory, while fluent was faster in this path. |
| Materialized View | Construction | 140.9 ns | 1.05 KB | 147.4 ns | 1.05 KB | Same allocation; fluent was slightly faster in this microbenchmark. |
Expand All @@ -488,10 +490,14 @@ BenchmarkDotNet guidance is documented in [docs/guides/benchmarks.md](docs/guide
| Scheduler Agent Supervisor | Execution | 177.46 ns | 1,304 B | 180.14 ns | 1,304 B | Effectively equivalent for this scenario. |
| Service Activator | Construction | 4.825 ns | 32 B | 4.641 ns | 32 B | Same allocation; generated was slightly faster in this microbenchmark. |
| Service Activator | Execution | 25.48 ns | 256 B | 26.49 ns | 256 B | Same allocation; fluent was slightly faster in this path. |
| Service Layer | Construction | 56.33 ns | 496 B | 41.36 ns | 296 B | Generated reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Service Layer | Execution | 151.32 ns | 960 B | 148.10 ns | 872 B | Generated slightly reduced execution time and allocation for the register-customer workflow. |
| Specification | Construction | 196.03 ns | 1,704 B | 136.87 ns | 1,008 B | Generated reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Specification | Execution | 111.25 ns | 344 B | 93.30 ns | 344 B | Same allocation; generated was faster for loan-application evaluation. |
| Table Data Gateway | Construction | 9.740 ns | 120 B | 9.698 ns | 120 B | Effectively equivalent for this microbenchmark. |
| Table Data Gateway | Execution | 90.51 ns | 600 B | 96.35 ns | 600 B | Same allocation; fluent was slightly faster for the insert-update-query workflow. |
| Transaction Script | Construction | 20.634 ns | 240 B | 5.839 ns | 40 B | Generated materially reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Transaction Script | Execution | 184.93 ns | 1,136 B | 98.28 ns | 600 B | Generated reduced execution time and allocation for the submit-order workflow. |
| Unit Of Work | Construction | 49.50 ns | 304 B | 46.91 ns | 304 B | Same allocation; generated was slightly faster in this microbenchmark. |
| Unit Of Work | Execution | 121.03 ns | 824 B | 96.91 ns | 520 B | Generated reduced execution time and allocation for the checkout commit workflow. |

Expand Down
29 changes: 29 additions & 0 deletions benchmarks/PatternKit.Benchmarks/Application/DomainEventBenchmarks.cs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
using BenchmarkDotNet.Attributes;
using PatternKit.Application.DomainEvents;
using PatternKit.Examples.DomainEventDemo;

namespace PatternKit.Benchmarks.Application;

[BenchmarkCategory("ApplicationArchitecture", "DomainEvent")]
public class DomainEventBenchmarks
{
[Benchmark(Baseline = true, Description = "Fluent: create domain event dispatcher")]
[BenchmarkCategory("Fluent", "Construction")]
public DomainEventDispatcher<OrderDomainEvent> Fluent_CreateDispatcher()
=> OrderDomainEventPolicies.CreateFluentDispatcher(new OrderEventProjection(), new List<string>());

[Benchmark(Description = "Generated: create domain event dispatcher")]
[BenchmarkCategory("Generated", "Construction")]
public IDomainEventDispatcher<OrderDomainEvent> Generated_CreateDispatcher()
=> GeneratedOrderDomainEvents.CreateDispatcher();
Comment on lines +17 to +18

[Benchmark(Description = "Fluent: dispatch order placed")]
[BenchmarkCategory("Fluent", "Execution")]
public ValueTask<OrderDomainEventSummary> Fluent_DispatchOrderPlaced()
=> OrderDomainEventDemo.RunFluentAsync();

[Benchmark(Description = "Generated: dispatch order placed")]
[BenchmarkCategory("Generated", "Execution")]
public ValueTask<OrderDomainEventSummary> Generated_DispatchOrderPlaced()
=> OrderDomainEventDemo.RunGeneratedAsync();
}
31 changes: 31 additions & 0 deletions benchmarks/PatternKit.Benchmarks/Application/ServiceLayerBenchmarks.cs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
using BenchmarkDotNet.Attributes;
using PatternKit.Application.Repository;
using PatternKit.Application.ServiceLayer;
using PatternKit.Examples.ServiceLayerDemo;

namespace PatternKit.Benchmarks.Application;

[BenchmarkCategory("ApplicationArchitecture", "ServiceLayer")]
public class ServiceLayerBenchmarks
{
[Benchmark(Baseline = true, Description = "Fluent: create service layer operation")]
[BenchmarkCategory("Fluent", "Construction")]
public ServiceLayerOperation<RegisterCustomerRequest, CustomerRegistrationReceipt> Fluent_CreateOperation()
=> CustomerServiceLayerPolicies.CreateFluentOperation(
InMemoryRepository<RegisteredCustomer, string>.Create(static customer => customer.CustomerId).Build());

[Benchmark(Description = "Generated: create service layer operation")]
[BenchmarkCategory("Generated", "Construction")]
public IServiceOperation<RegisterCustomerRequest, CustomerRegistrationReceipt> Generated_CreateOperation()
=> GeneratedCustomerServiceLayer.CreateOperation();
Comment on lines +19 to +20

[Benchmark(Description = "Fluent: register customer")]
[BenchmarkCategory("Fluent", "Execution")]
public ValueTask<CustomerServiceLayerSummary> Fluent_RegisterCustomer()
=> CustomerServiceLayerDemo.RunFluentAsync();

[Benchmark(Description = "Generated: register customer")]
[BenchmarkCategory("Generated", "Execution")]
public ValueTask<CustomerServiceLayerSummary> Generated_RegisterCustomer()
=> CustomerServiceLayerDemo.RunGeneratedAsync();
}
31 changes: 31 additions & 0 deletions benchmarks/PatternKit.Benchmarks/Application/TransactionScriptBenchmarks.cs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
using BenchmarkDotNet.Attributes;
using PatternKit.Application.Repository;
using PatternKit.Application.TransactionScript;
using PatternKit.Examples.TransactionScriptDemo;

namespace PatternKit.Benchmarks.Application;

[BenchmarkCategory("ApplicationArchitecture", "TransactionScript")]
public class TransactionScriptBenchmarks
{
[Benchmark(Baseline = true, Description = "Fluent: create transaction script")]
[BenchmarkCategory("Fluent", "Construction")]
public TransactionScript<SubmitOrderRequest, SubmitOrderReceipt> Fluent_CreateScript()
=> OrderTransactionScriptPolicies.CreateFluentScript(
InMemoryRepository<SubmittedOrder, string>.Create(static order => order.OrderId).Build());

[Benchmark(Description = "Generated: create transaction script")]
[BenchmarkCategory("Generated", "Construction")]
public ITransactionScript<SubmitOrderRequest, SubmitOrderReceipt> Generated_CreateScript()
=> GeneratedSubmitOrderScript.CreateScript();
Comment on lines +19 to +20

[Benchmark(Description = "Fluent: submit order")]
[BenchmarkCategory("Fluent", "Execution")]
public ValueTask<OrderTransactionScriptSummary> Fluent_SubmitOrder()
=> OrderTransactionScriptDemo.RunFluentAsync();

[Benchmark(Description = "Generated: submit order")]
[BenchmarkCategory("Generated", "Execution")]
public ValueTask<OrderTransactionScriptSummary> Generated_SubmitOrder()
=> OrderTransactionScriptDemo.RunGeneratedAsync();
}
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions docs/guides/benchmark-results.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ The latest measured timings below were captured on Windows 11, Intel Core i9-149
| Cache-Aside | Execution | 216.50 ns | 1,048 B | 208.60 ns | 1,048 B | Same allocation; generated was slightly faster for the miss-then-hit workflow. |
| Data Mapper | Construction | 40.56 ns | 288 B | 12.87 ns | 112 B | Generated reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Data Mapper | Execution | 188.09 ns | 1,104 B | 97.71 ns | 672 B | Generated reduced execution time and allocation for the map-store-load workflow. |
| Domain Event | Construction | 199.5 ns | 1.34 KB | 157.6 ns | 1.04 KB | Generated reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Domain Event | Execution | 367.2 ns | 1.77 KB | 346.4 ns | 1.55 KB | Generated reduced execution time and allocation for the order-placed dispatch workflow. |
| Leader Election | Construction | 14.28 ns | 104 B | 15.91 ns | 104 B | Same allocation; fluent was slightly faster in this microbenchmark. |
| Leader Election | Execution | 43.62 ns | 360 B | 144.37 ns | 312 B | Generated allocated about 13% less memory, while fluent was faster in this path. |
| Materialized View | Construction | 140.9 ns | 1.05 KB | 147.4 ns | 1.05 KB | Same allocation; fluent was slightly faster in this microbenchmark. |
Expand All @@ -35,10 +37,14 @@ The latest measured timings below were captured on Windows 11, Intel Core i9-149
| Scheduler Agent Supervisor | Execution | 177.46 ns | 1,304 B | 180.14 ns | 1,304 B | Effectively equivalent for this scenario. |
| Service Activator | Construction | 4.825 ns | 32 B | 4.641 ns | 32 B | Same allocation; generated was slightly faster in this microbenchmark. |
| Service Activator | Execution | 25.48 ns | 256 B | 26.49 ns | 256 B | Same allocation; fluent was slightly faster in this path. |
| Service Layer | Construction | 56.33 ns | 496 B | 41.36 ns | 296 B | Generated reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Service Layer | Execution | 151.32 ns | 960 B | 148.10 ns | 872 B | Generated slightly reduced execution time and allocation for the register-customer workflow. |
| Specification | Construction | 196.03 ns | 1,704 B | 136.87 ns | 1,008 B | Generated reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Specification | Execution | 111.25 ns | 344 B | 93.30 ns | 344 B | Same allocation; generated was faster for loan-application evaluation. |
| Table Data Gateway | Construction | 9.740 ns | 120 B | 9.698 ns | 120 B | Effectively equivalent for this microbenchmark. |
| Table Data Gateway | Execution | 90.51 ns | 600 B | 96.35 ns | 600 B | Same allocation; fluent was slightly faster for the insert-update-query workflow. |
| Transaction Script | Construction | 20.634 ns | 240 B | 5.839 ns | 40 B | Generated materially reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Transaction Script | Execution | 184.93 ns | 1,136 B | 98.28 ns | 600 B | Generated reduced execution time and allocation for the submit-order workflow. |
| Unit Of Work | Construction | 49.50 ns | 304 B | 46.91 ns | 304 B | Same allocation; generated was slightly faster in this microbenchmark. |
| Unit Of Work | Execution | 121.03 ns | 824 B | 96.91 ns | 520 B | Generated reduced execution time and allocation for the checkout commit workflow. |

Expand Down
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions docs/guides/benchmarks.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ The following numbers were captured on Windows 11, Intel Core i9-14900K, .NET SD
| Cache-Aside | Execution | 216.50 ns | 1,048 B | 208.60 ns | 1,048 B | Same allocation; generated was slightly faster for the miss-then-hit workflow. |
| Data Mapper | Construction | 40.56 ns | 288 B | 12.87 ns | 112 B | Generated reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Data Mapper | Execution | 188.09 ns | 1,104 B | 97.71 ns | 672 B | Generated reduced execution time and allocation for the map-store-load workflow. |
| Domain Event | Construction | 199.5 ns | 1.34 KB | 157.6 ns | 1.04 KB | Generated reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Domain Event | Execution | 367.2 ns | 1.77 KB | 346.4 ns | 1.55 KB | Generated reduced execution time and allocation for the order-placed dispatch workflow. |
| Leader Election | Construction | 14.28 ns | 104 B | 15.91 ns | 104 B | Same allocation; fluent was slightly faster in this microbenchmark. |
| Leader Election | Execution | 43.62 ns | 360 B | 144.37 ns | 312 B | Generated allocated about 13% less memory, while fluent was faster in this path. |
| Materialized View | Construction | 140.9 ns | 1.05 KB | 147.4 ns | 1.05 KB | Same allocation; fluent was slightly faster in this microbenchmark. |
Expand All @@ -52,10 +54,14 @@ The following numbers were captured on Windows 11, Intel Core i9-14900K, .NET SD
| Scheduler Agent Supervisor | Execution | 177.46 ns | 1,304 B | 180.14 ns | 1,304 B | Effectively equivalent for this scenario. |
| Service Activator | Construction | 4.825 ns | 32 B | 4.641 ns | 32 B | Same allocation; generated was slightly faster in this microbenchmark. |
| Service Activator | Execution | 25.48 ns | 256 B | 26.49 ns | 256 B | Same allocation; fluent was slightly faster in this path. |
| Service Layer | Construction | 56.33 ns | 496 B | 41.36 ns | 296 B | Generated reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Service Layer | Execution | 151.32 ns | 960 B | 148.10 ns | 872 B | Generated slightly reduced execution time and allocation for the register-customer workflow. |
| Specification | Construction | 196.03 ns | 1,704 B | 136.87 ns | 1,008 B | Generated reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Specification | Execution | 111.25 ns | 344 B | 93.30 ns | 344 B | Same allocation; generated was faster for loan-application evaluation. |
| Table Data Gateway | Construction | 9.740 ns | 120 B | 9.698 ns | 120 B | Effectively equivalent for this microbenchmark. |
| Table Data Gateway | Execution | 90.51 ns | 600 B | 96.35 ns | 600 B | Same allocation; fluent was slightly faster for the insert-update-query workflow. |
| Transaction Script | Construction | 20.634 ns | 240 B | 5.839 ns | 40 B | Generated materially reduced construction time and allocation in this microbenchmark. |
| Transaction Script | Execution | 184.93 ns | 1,136 B | 98.28 ns | 600 B | Generated reduced execution time and allocation for the submit-order workflow. |
| Unit Of Work | Construction | 49.50 ns | 304 B | 46.91 ns | 304 B | Same allocation; generated was slightly faster in this microbenchmark. |
| Unit Of Work | Execution | 121.03 ns | 824 B | 96.91 ns | 520 B | Generated reduced execution time and allocation for the checkout commit workflow. |

Expand Down
Loading