New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Displaying type names in ComparingUnrelatedTypesInspection. #375

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: idea171.x
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@greenjoe
Contributor

greenjoe commented Mar 28, 2017

The inspection description now says which types cannot be compared so that it's easier to find an error, especially when comparing two types with same name but different packages.
ScalaInspectionTestBase methods that check if there are errors are slightly changed so that it is possible to test for inspections with non-constant description.

It looks like in some cases from tests the type description looks a bit strange (B.type when B is an object or a.type when comparing with isInstanceOf) but I believe it is still much better than not having types in descriptions at all.

Displaying type names in ComparingUnrelatedTypesInspection.
The message now says which types cannot be compared so that
it's easier to find an error.
ScalaInspectionTestBase methods that check if there are errors
are slightly changed so that it is possible to test for errors with
non-constant description.
@niktrop

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

niktrop commented Apr 11, 2017

I merged your fix manually with a couple of changes: 7f9428b
I have added extracting singleton types to the generateComparingUnrelatedTypesMsg method and a test for the case when types have the same simple name.
Very nice fix, thank you.

@niktrop niktrop closed this Apr 11, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment