Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
Just FYI -- You can use
You'd think the same would work with
Also, apparently, RSA with no padding is insecure.
I don't remember this PR and have nothing to do with it. Close it, I guess?
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Jeremie Miller email@example.com
@krisb are you still using your fork that supports no-padding (or is anyone else)? I haven't tested it yet, but the advantage I see of having it merged in is that it allows the app to implement its own padding and just use this lib to do the crypto.
As @ryanrhee mentioned using no-padding as the end result is definitely unwise, but at least this would give more padding choices than what is built in?