Skip to content

Conversation

@baggepinnen
Copy link
Member

The benchmarks show it's quite a lot faster than the previous freqresp. The new version is labelled "large" because I had originally intended to use it for large systems only, but it turned out to be faster across the board. The benchmark is performed on a 2x2 system with varying order of the state, evaluating the freqresp on 200 frequency points.
plot_45

@JuliaControlBot
Copy link

Something failed when generating plots. See the log at https://github.com/JuliaControl/ControlExamplePlots.jl/actions/runs/1686630449?check_suite_focus=true for more details.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #598 (26b8265) into master (a0fd283) will increase coverage by 0.39%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #598      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.28%   85.68%   +0.39%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines        3188     3200      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits         2719     2742      +23     
+ Misses        469      458      -11     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/freqresp.jl 98.03% <100.00%> (+12.48%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a0fd283...26b8265. Read the comment docs.

@baggepinnen baggepinnen merged commit 5723ef7 into master Jan 12, 2022
@baggepinnen baggepinnen deleted the freqresp_hess branch January 12, 2022 09:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants