Skip to content

Conversation

@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

@tkelman tkelman commented Mar 17, 2017

Ref #185 (comment), would like to change the target branch to that once it's created. DiffBase 0.0.5 still supports Julia 0.4 and caused ForwardDiff 0.3.4, the last tag here that supported 0.4, to now fail its tests - https://github.com/JuliaCI/pkg.julialang.org/blob/69282b38ea4ea43a5b300862eac40d89bbf03b7a/logs/ForwardDiff_0.4.log

In local testing, this fixes it.

tkelman and others added 2 commits March 16, 2017 21:19
… to include v0.6 fixes (JuliaDiff#184)"

This reverts commit 62ad04b.
If higher minimum versions are only needed for 0.6, they should be loosened here

Upper bound this branch so it is not installable on 0.6.
@jrevels
Copy link
Member

jrevels commented Mar 17, 2017

If this is only to make PkgEval happy, I'm fine with doing the backport this time (since we already have everything laid out), but in the future I'd rather just bump DiffBase's Julia lower bound version requirement to match ForwardDiff/ReverseDiff than take on the development overhead of supporting a Julia version which has already gone the way of the dinosaur (in my mind, anyway).

@tkelman tkelman changed the base branch from master to release-0.3 March 17, 2017 17:21
@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkelman commented Mar 17, 2017

Next time do that before tagging a version that causes downstream test failures. If this wasn't a test addition pointing out an obvious bug with a simple fix, I'd agree.

@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkelman commented Mar 17, 2017

Julia 0.4 is still used in quite a few places. If it isn't broken, try not to make things any worse there.

@tkelman tkelman closed this Mar 18, 2017
@tkelman tkelman reopened this Mar 18, 2017
@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkelman commented Mar 18, 2017

Good to go here, and tag as 0.3.5?

@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkelman commented Mar 19, 2017

ping

@jrevels jrevels merged commit 805ad5d into JuliaDiff:release-0.3 Mar 21, 2017
@jrevels
Copy link
Member

jrevels commented Mar 21, 2017

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants