-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
add per-module optimization level #34896
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
It might be better to map this directly to LLVM's |
657c934 to
9460b3e
Compare
|
Ready for review. Now that we have #35157, this should be able to work without affecting other functions that happen to be in the same llvm module. |
vtjnash
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you have new numbers for this?
|
With this, setting |
9460b3e to
8f4f839
Compare
|
Ok I think this is ready to go. |
8f4f839 to
64c4d46
Compare
|
I think this PR caused #35393 (comment) |
Time for
display(plot(rand(10)))on Plots master, baseline:On this branch, adding
Base.@optlevel 0to Plots.jl: