-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
Bump LLVM tarballs on 1.4 #35120
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump LLVM tarballs on 1.4 #35120
Conversation
* use cxx11-specific downloads instead of GCC-version-specific downloads * Default to `cxx11` when it's indeterminate
|
Hmmm, the win32 tester has failed the Distributed and SuiteSparse tests pretty regularly, despite my attempts to rebuild it. I'm going to keep trying, but if I can't get it to go through I'm going to call this more than just bad luck. |
|
I also reran it once with those failures. |
|
Okay, it's happened enough times now that I think it's a real failure. We're getting julia/stdlib/Distributed/test/distributed_exec.jl Lines 762 to 779 in 4f718ae
We're getting another julia/stdlib/SuiteSparse/test/threads.jl Lines 3 to 20 in 4f718ae
It looks threading related to me; I don't understand why this is failing now. |
|
I've been unable to narrow this down any further. I vote we release as-is. |
|
Okay. Let's merge this, rerun CI on my backport branch, merge that if things look OK and release. |
* Switch LLVM BB download to new format * use cxx11-specific downloads instead of GCC-version-specific downloads * Default to `cxx11` when it's indeterminate * handle CXX expanded BB builds * Add LLVM_full checksums Co-authored-by: Valentin Churavy <v.churavy@gmail.com>
This rebuilds and upgrades the LLVM tarballs on 1.4, backporting some naming changes and such from 1.5, but functionally should be identical.