Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #38386, macro defining empty function with escaped name #38402

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2020

Conversation

JeffBezanson
Copy link
Sponsor Member

fix #38386

@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson added kind:bugfix This change fixes an existing bug macros @macros labels Nov 11, 2020
@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson added the status:merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label Nov 21, 2020
@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson merged commit 349e072 into master Nov 23, 2020
@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson deleted the jb/fix38386 branch November 23, 2020 21:39
@simeonschaub
Copy link
Member

Would it make sense to backport this?

@KristofferC
Copy link
Sponsor Member

To what?

@simeonschaub
Copy link
Member

1.5, or is there even going to be a 1.5.4 release?

@KristofferC
Copy link
Sponsor Member

Ah, 1.5. Can add a backport label in case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:bugfix This change fixes an existing bug macros @macros
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

defining empty function with escaped name in macro does not work
5 participants