-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
Add Irrational support to rem2pi #43539
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
garrison
wants to merge
2
commits into
JuliaLang:master
Choose a base branch
from
garrison:rem2pi-irrational
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like we need a similar check --- if the conversion is inaccurate the answer might be completely wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. Based on your comment and some additional thinking on my part, I have added an additional commit to this PR: ee83f2f. I'm not sure that it actually addresses the fundamental issue you raise, but let me explain my reasoning.
When I first opened this PR, I thought it made sense to convert to a
Float64, but I have since realized that callingfloatwill work better more generally. This was motivated by thinking about howBigFloatshould behave, even though it turns out thatrem2pi(::BigFloat, r)is already defined in mpfr.jl, so this is not strictly needed forBigFloat. (Note thatrem2piis already defined forFloat32andFloat16just above the current block of code.)Although this change does not result in a similar check to the integer case, it now puts
rem2pion the same footing as the::Realimplementation of many other functions, including trig functions which, like this one, accept radians as argument. I don't see any reason why the bar for accuracy should be higher forrem2pithan for those functions (think oftan, for instance, which has the same period but is more poorly conditioned because of the asymptotes).