We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
While working on reproducible builds for openSUSE, I found that our juliaup 1.6.0 package varied from entry order issues in the versionsdb.json file.
juliaup
versionsdb.json
{ "AvailableVersions": { - "1.1.0+0~x86": { - "UrlPath": "bin/linux/x86/1.1/julia-1.1.0-linux-i686.tar.gz" + "1.6.5+0~x64": { + "UrlPath": "bin/linux/x64/1.6/julia-1.6.5-linux-x86_64.tar.gz" },
This caused variations in resulting /usr/bin/julialauncher and /usr/bin/juliaup binaries.
/usr/bin/julialauncher
/usr/bin/juliaup
It should be possible to build twice and get identical binaries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I believe this should now be fixed on main.
main
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
While working on reproducible builds for openSUSE, I found that
our
juliaup
1.6.0 package varied from entry order issues in theversionsdb.json
file.This caused variations in resulting
/usr/bin/julialauncher
and/usr/bin/juliaup
binaries.It should be possible to build twice and get identical binaries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: