From 28c174dbcbe881083da94a5528dd669a79b4ae47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: gotmachine <24925209+gotmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:23:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Gated PartUpwardCache leaks logging behind a specific #DEFINE
 to avoid being spammed in debug builds

---
 KSPCommunityFixes/Performance/MemoryLeaks.cs | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/KSPCommunityFixes/Performance/MemoryLeaks.cs b/KSPCommunityFixes/Performance/MemoryLeaks.cs
index cae58d7..c10393b 100644
--- a/KSPCommunityFixes/Performance/MemoryLeaks.cs
+++ b/KSPCommunityFixes/Performance/MemoryLeaks.cs
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
-using CommNet;
+//#define LOG_PART_UPWARD_CACHE_LEAKS
+
+using CommNet;
 using HarmonyLib;
 using KSP.UI;
 using KSP.UI.Screens;
@@ -741,7 +743,7 @@ static void Part_OnDestroy_Postfix(Part __instance)
             __instance.parent = __instance.potentialParent = null;
             __instance.internalModel = null;
 
-#if DEBUG
+#if LOG_PART_UPWARD_CACHE_LEAKS
             if (FlightGlobals.objectToPartUpwardsCache.Values.Contains(__instance))
             {
                 Debug.LogError($"Destroying part {__instance.GetInstanceID()} while it's still in the objectToPartUpwardsCache");