Skip to content

HTTPS clone URL

Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with HTTPS or Subversion.

Download ZIP

v5.13.11

Perl v5.13.11 - The ultimate 5.13 release
  When the full-grown poet came,
  Out spake pleased Nature (the round impassive globe, with all its
      shows of day and night,) saying, He is mine;
  But out spake too the Soul of man, proud, jealous and unreconciled,
      Nay he is mine alone;
  --Then the full-grown poet stood between the two, and took each
      by the hand;
  And to-day and ever so stands, as blender, uniter, tightly holding hands,
  Which he will never release until he reconciles the two,
  And wholly and joyously blends them.

      --  Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass

v5.10.0

The real 5.10.0 release; the perl-5.10.0 tag is wrong

v5.13.10

Perl v5.13.10 - The penultimate 5.13 release
    Skalat maðr rúnar rísta,
    nema ráða vel kunni.
    Þat verðr mörgum manni,
    es of myrkvan staf villisk.
    Sák á telgðu talkni
    tíu launstafi ristna.
    Þat hefr lauka lindi
    langs ofrtrega fengit.

        -- Egill Skalla-Grímsson
           Egils saga Skalla-Grímssonar

v5.12.3

Fourth release of the v5.12 series!

v5.13.9

The release of perl v5.13.9

v5.13.2

Third release of the v5.13 series!

v5.13.1

Second release of the v5.13 series!

v5.12.1-RC1

The first release candidate for Perl 5.12.1

v5.12.1-RC0

The 0th release of Perl 5.12.1

v5.13.0

First release of the v5.13 series!

v5.12.0

The first stable release of the 5.12 series

v5.12.0-RC5

Perl 5.12.0 Release Candidate 5

v5.12.0-RC4

4th release candidate for Perl 5.12.0

v5.12.0-RC3

The third release candidate for Perl 5.12.0

v5.12.0-RC2

The second release candidate of perl 5.12.0

v5.12.0-RC1

The first release candidate for Perl 5.12.0

v5.12.0-RC0

Perl 5.12.0 - release candidate zero

v5.11.0

First released version in the 5.11 devel series

perl-5.10.1

Final release of Perl 5.10.1

perl-5.10.1-RC2

Release Candidate 2 of Perl 5.10.1

perl-5.10.1-RC1

Release Candidate 1 of Perl 5.10.1

code-review/2009-07-22

Code Review from IRC
On #corehackers:
17:56  jjore> Did you mean to drop all the MAD support?
17:56  nperez> yeah, i was noticing that too
17:57  jjore> I thought MAD was rotting but I wouldn't remove it.
18:26  xdg> jjore, I dropped it because I didn't understand it and someone
            here said to take it out
18:46  jdb> xdg: Larry said the MAD stuff should not be dropped, even if it
            bitrots a bit: http://use.perl.org/~chromatic/journal/39125
18:51  xdg> jdb, noted.  thanks.
18:54  xdg> reading that, I'll call what I did "bitrot".  Since I don't
            understand MAD, I don't know how to make it do the right thing
            as I change the code around it, so it's out.  That's different
            than someone ripping all the MAD stuff out for the sake of
            eliminating MAD
18:55  jdb> Maybe just leave the code in there, commented out with a short
            explanation
18:55  jdb> That's easier than tracking down the missing bit in git later.
18:55  jdb> At least it gives someone who understands the MAD stuff a better
            chance to see what might be missing

On #p5p
18:26 @jjore> xdg, in http://github.com/dagolden/perl/commit/5fdce45a7889979e70453fa36d2dd3aa1c73d808,
              I'm not sure that package names can't have nulls in them.
18:26 +dipsy> urgh. long url. Try http://tinyurl.com/nus6p9
18:26 @jjore> though, never when parsed.
18:27 @xdg> jjore, that's a version number, which can't be null
18:28 @jjore> Ah. Long ago I asked on perl5-porters@ for Larry's definition of
              each of the MAD tokens. You could use that.
18:28 @jjore> but I meant the package, not the version.
18:29 @jjore> Null handling in packages is problematic and not supported tho,
              I think.
18:29 @jjore> Once, I said bless([], "\0") to bless at the '' package but
              not get the ''->'main' conversion
18:29 @xdg> I'm not sure I understand the problem.
18:30 @jjore> *{"Devel::\0::Hi::VERSION"} = ...
18:30 @xdg> I think if PL_curstname is "\0", then package_version ends up
            trying to set "$::VERSION"
18:32 @jjore> No, ${"\0::VERSION"}
18:33 @jjore> I feel like I'm bike-shedding though.
18:36 @jjore> If the current source code is utf8, presumably $VERSION
              will be too
18:36 @jjore> and did you drop support for unversioned packages?
18:37 @jjore> maybe I'm not reading the grammar right.
18:48 @xdg> unversioned packages are just fine.  $VERSION will be whatever
            scan_version() parses, which is what "use MODULE VERSION" does,
            so if that's broken for utf8, it's broken for both
18:48 @jjore> fascinating.
18:48 @jjore> I wonder if it is.
18:49 @jjore> or it's an interesting corner to poke at sometime.
18:49 @xdg> Since I'm doing sv_catpv(), I would think that if the *PV of
            PL_curstnam is "\0", that it concatenates like the empty string
18:50 @xdg> Oh, I see.  *PV is actually "\0\0" with LEN 1
18:51 @xdg> I'd suggest fixing that by banning \0 as a package name.
            It's stupid in the first place.

GitLive-blead

State of blead when we went live with Git as our repository

GitLive-maint-5.6

State of maint-5.6 when we went live with Git as our repository

GitLive-maint-5.8

State of maint-5.8 when we went live with Git as our repository

GitLive-maint-5.10

State of maint-5.10 when we went live with Git as our repository

GitLive-maint-5.004

State of maint-5.004 when we went live with Git as our repository

GitLive-maint-5.005

State of maint-5.005 when we went live with Git as our repository

perl-5.8.9

5.8.9
    Frank and I, unlike the civil servants, were still puzzled that such a
    proposal as the Europass could even be seriously under consideration by
    the FCO. We can both see clearly that it is wonderful ammunition for the
    anti-Europeans. I asked Humphrey if the Foreign Office doesn't realise
    how damaging this would be to the European ideal?

    'I'm sure they do, Minister, he said. That's why they support it.'

    This was even more puzzling, since I'd always been under the impression
    that the FO is pro-Europe. 'Is it or isn't it?' I asked Humphrey.

    'Yes and no,' he replied of course, 'if you'll pardon the
    expression. The Foreign Office is pro-Europe because it is really
    anti-Europe. In fact the Civil Service was united in its desire to make
    sure the Common Market didn't work. That's why we went into it.'

    This sounded like a riddle to me. I asked him to explain further. And
    basically his argument was as follows: Britain has had the same foreign
    policy objective for at least the last five hundred years - to create a
    disunited Europe. In that cause we have fought with the Dutch against
    the Spanish, with the Germans against the French, with the French and
    Italians against the Germans, and with the French against the Italians
    and Germans. [The Dutch rebellion against Phillip II of Spain, the
    Napoleonic Wars, the First World War, and the Second World War - Ed.]

    In other words, divide and rule. And the Foreign Office can see no
    reason to change when it has worked so well until now.

    I was aware of this, naturally, but I regarded it as ancient history.
    Humphrey thinks that it is, in fact, current policy. It was necessary
    for us to break up the EEC, he explained, so we had to get inside. We
    had previously tried to break it up from the outside, but that didn't
    work. [A reference to our futile and short-lived involvement in EFTA,
    the European Free Trade Association, founded in 1960 and which the UK
    left in 1972 - Ed.] Now that we're in, we are able to make a complete
    pig's breakfast out of it. We've now set the Germans against the French,
    the French against the Italians, the Italians against the Dutch... and
    the Foreign office is terribly happy. It's just like old time.

    I was staggered by all of this. I thought that the all of us who are
    publicly pro-European believed in the European ideal. I said this to Sir
    Humphrey, and he simply chuckled.

    So I asked him: if we don't believe in the European Ideal, why are we
    pushing to increase the membership?

    'Same reason,' came the reply. 'It's just like the United Nations. The
    more members it has, the more arguments you can stir up, and the more
    futile and impotent it becomes.'

    This all strikes me as the most appalling cynicism, and I said so.

    Sir Humphrey agreed completely. 'Yes Minister. We call it
    diplomacy. It's what made Britain great, you know.'

[pp.119-120 _The complete Yes Minister // The Diaries of a Cabinet Minister
by the Right Hon. James Hacker MP._ v "The Writing on the Wall" *]

Blame transfer protocol complete. S.E.P. field now fully enaged.

Nicholas Clark

* http://www.jonathanlynn.com/Books/Complete_Yes_Minister/complete_yes_minister.htm

perl-5.8.9-RC1

5.8.9 RC1
    A jumbo jet touched down, with BURANDAN AIRWAYS written on the side. I
    was hugely impressed. British Airways are having to pawn their Concordes,
    and here is this little tiny African state with its own airline, jumbo
    jets and all.

    I asked Bernard how many planes Burandan Airways had. 'None,' he said.

    I told him not to be silly and use his eyes. 'No Minister, it belongs to
    Freddie Laker,' he said. 'They chartered it last week and repainted it
    specially.' Apparently most of the Have-Nots (I mean, LDCs) do this - at
    the opening of the UN General Assembly the runways of Kennedy Airport are
    jam-packed with phoney flag-carriers. 'In fact,' said Bernard with a sly
    grin, 'there was one 747 that belonged to nine different African airlines
    in a month. They called it the mumbo-jumbo.'

    While we watched nothing much happening on the TV except the mumbo-jumbo
    taxiing around Prestwick and the Queen looking a bit chilly, Bernard gave
    me the next day's schedule and explained that I was booked on the night
    sleeper from King's Cross to Edinburgh because I had to vote in a
    three-line whip at the House tonight and would have to miss the last
    plane. Then the commentator, in that special hushed BBC voice used for any
    occasion with which Royalty is connected, announced reverentially that we
    were about to catch our first glimpse of President Selim.

    And out of the plane stepped Charlie. My old friend Charlie Umtali. We
    were at LSE together. Not Selim Mohammed at all, but Charlie.

    Bernard asked me if I were sure. Silly question. How could you forget a
    name like Charlie Umtali?

    I sent Bernard for Sir Humphrey, who was delighted to hear that we now
    know something about our official visitor.

    Bernard's official brief said nothing. Amazing! Amazing how little the FCO
    has been able to find out. Perhaps they were hoping it would all be on the
    car radio. All the brief says is that Colonel Selim Mohammed had converted
    to Islam some years ago, they didn't know his original name, and therefore
    knew little of his background.

    I was able to tell Humphrey and Bernard /all/ about his background.
    Charlie was a red-hot political economist, I informed them. Got the top
    first. Wiped the floor with everyone.

    Bernard seemed relieved. 'Well that's all right then.'

    'Why?' I enquired.

    'I think Bernard means,' said Sir Humphrey helpfully, 'that he'll know how
    to behave if he was at an English University. Even if it was the LSE.' I
    never know whether or not Humphrey is insulting me intentionally.

    Humphrey was concerned about Charlie's political colour. 'When you said
    that he was red-hot, were you speaking politically?'

    In a way I was. 'The thing about Charlie is that you never quite know
    where you are with him. He's the sort of chap who follows you into a
    revolving door and comes out in front.'

    'No deeply held convictions?' asked Sir Humphrey.

    'No. The only thing Charlie was committed too was Charlie.'

    'Ah, I see. A politician, Minister.'

[p44 _The complete Yes Minister // The Diaries of a Cabinet Minister by
the Right Hon. James Hacker MP._ ii "The Official Visit" *]

Nicholas Clark

* Very very funny, timeless, and scarily topical, even 28 years later. See
http://www.jonathanlynn.com/Books/Complete_Yes_Minister/complete_yes_minister.htm

timinatorII

Amend note for Changes 984 and 985
 _  _           _  _           _  _             ___
| \| |___ _ __ | \| |___ _ __ | \| |___ _ __   / _/†
| .` / _ \ '  \| .` / _ \ '  \| .` / _ \ '  \ / /‡_ @984 @985
|_|\_\___/_|_|_|_|\_\___/_|_|_|_|\_\___/_|_|_|____/‰

   The RAMPAGE of the TIMINATOR continues!

timinator

Amend note for missing Changes around 872 ~ 922
  ___        _  _           _  _             ___
 / _ \ _ __ | \| |___ _ __ | \| |___ _ __   / _/† @872  @897  @910
| (_) | '  \| .` / _ \ '  \| .` / _ \ '  \ / /‡_@886 @906 @887  @904
 \___/|_|_|_|_|\_\___/_|_|_|_|\_\___/_|_|_|____/‰ @896 @922 @905

   The Mighty TIMINATOR has GOBBLED UP these changes!
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.