Set (smaller) font size for item description separately

[lindeloev]

I would like to set a much smaller font size for item descriptions in order to increase the focus on the item name. I am coming from Albert which has this layout:

So maybe add font_description_size and font_description_style options?

[polyvertex]

This will probably end up with a listitem_title_size setting being added as an enum (small, normal, large) so to match the desired font size, as defined by the font_small_size, font_normal_size and font_large_size settings respectively. Default value would be small for consistency with previous releases.

[lindeloev]

Sounds great to me. Thanks for considering it!

[polyvertex]

Implemented in v2.20.
Feature is slightly different than described above but same spirit!

[lindeloev]

That is beyond aweseome, @polyvertex! 26 hours from feature wish to implementation. I'm very happy I donated via PayPal. I hope others are supporting economically as well.

Waiting for the chocolatey to get v2.20. http://keypirinha.com/update.html does not mention upgrading via chocolatey, but I assume it's just

• Close Keypirinha
• Run choco update keypirinha

[polyvertex]

Well, to be fully honest, it's just that I was about to make a release and decided to include your request since it was no big deal :)

Re: choco, their CDN might take a while to be updated (up to 30 minutes announced).

[laurinkeithdavis]

That is beyond aweseome, @polyvertex! 26 hours from feature wish to implementation. I'm very happy I donated via PayPal. I hope others are supporting economically as well.

Waiting for the chocolatey to get v2.20. http://keypirinha.com/update.html does not mention upgrading via chocolatey, but I assume it's just

• Close Keypirinha
• Run choco update keypirinha

You don't have to close Keypirinha - the installation script closes it automatically. You will have to launch it again manually.

[polyvertex]

@laurin1 while not being a technical requirement, it is still good practice to exit the app gracefully first.

[laurinkeithdavis]

@polyvertex that kind of kills the point of using choco though. I'm almost never updating AN application. On my primary machines, I'm updating 30-50 apps, on my servers, 10-20, using "cup all".

[polyvertex]

@laurin1 well, it all boils down to how choco scripts are crafted and more specifically what the commonly used Stop-Process cmdlet really does under the hood - if you happen to know.

For instance, it seems the taskkill util will first try to send a close message to the target app and wait for it before just terminating the process after some reasonable amount of time in case it's still running and the force flag has been specified. This is would happen to be in accordance with MS' guidelines.

If Stop-Process follows the same pattern, then all good. I would tend to guess it does since its flags are pretty similar to taskkill's and both are developed by MS so they hopefully opted for consistency. But I have no clue.

[laurinkeithdavis]

I feel confident that Stop-Process does attempt a safe shutdown first, but I'm doing some digging to get a better answer.