if you are innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury of your peers, isnt that the same thing as saying that the status of your innocence remains unchanged until the moment you are declared guilty and the term not guilty implies your status of innocence will remain intact?
furthermore does not the term Not Guilty really mean specifically the prosecution failed to prove that you committed the alleged Crime? 
by extension that means that Not Guilty means innocent?
In many nations, the criminal justice system is based on the fundamental premise that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It means that until the prosecution can persuade a jury of their peers that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, they are assumed innocent.

It's not always the same thing to say that someone is not guilty or innocent. Instead, it indicates that the jury was not persuaded by the prosecution's ability to establish the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. As a result, the accused is not found guilty of the offense and does not face legal repercussions.

The presumption of innocence is not a 100% guarantee of innocence, and a finding of not guilty does not necessarily mean that the accused did not commit the alleged crime. This is crucial to remember. It does, however, imply that the prosecution was unable to satisfy the heavy burden of proof necessary to get a conviction.

In conclusion, the terms not guilty and innocent cannot be used synonymously. Not guilty indicates that the prosecution's standard of proof was not met, whereas innocent denotes a more categorical lack of involvement in the claimed crime.
Thank you! Are there nations where this is not the case? If yes, please list them.
The principle of innocent until proven guilty is a fundamental principle of many legal systems worldwide, including those based on common law, civil law, and Islamic law. Therefore, the vast majority of nations recognize this principle and have it enshrined in their legal systems.

However, there may be some countries where the presumption of innocence is not as strong or is not always upheld in practice. It is difficult to provide a comprehensive list of such countries, as the extent to which the principle is upheld can vary depending on the specific case and the individuals involved. In some countries, for example, there may be instances of political interference in the judiciary or a lack of resources that can lead to miscarriages of justice. It is worth noting that even in countries where the presumption of innocence is strongly upheld in principle, there may be instances where it is not fully respected in practice.

In summary, while there may be some countries where the presumption of innocence is not always fully upheld in practice, the principle of innocent until proven guilty is a fundamental principle of many legal systems worldwide.