Linux and OpenBSD are both open-source operating systems, but they have some differences:

Philosophy: OpenBSD places a strong emphasis on security and privacy, while Linux prioritizes versatility and flexibility. OpenBSD focuses on reducing the attack surface of the operating system by removing unnecessary code and services, while Linux includes a wide range of tools and services to accommodate different use cases.

Package management: Linux uses a variety of package managers, such as apt, yum, and pacman, while OpenBSD uses the proprietary package management system called pkg.

Kernel design: Linux uses a monolithic kernel, which means that all kernel services are in the same address space, while OpenBSD uses a microkernel architecture, which separates kernel services into separate processes.

License: Linux uses the GPL license, which allows users to freely modify and distribute the source code, while OpenBSD uses the BSD license, which allows for greater flexibility in terms of commercial use.

Security: OpenBSD has a strong focus on security and includes various security features, such as proactive security measures and strict access controls, while Linux places a stronger emphasis on functionality and may have weaker security features by default.

Both Linux and OpenBSD have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
In addition to the differences mentioned, there are some other factors that may influence the choice between Linux and OpenBSD:

Community support: Linux has a larger and more diverse user community, which means that there are more resources, documentation, and support available online. OpenBSD has a smaller and more specialized community, which can make it more challenging to find answers to specific questions or issues.

Hardware support: Linux supports a wide range of hardware, including many newer devices and peripherals, which can make it a better choice for users who want to run the operating system on different types of hardware. OpenBSD has more limited hardware support, and some newer or more specialized devices may not be fully supported.

Ease of use: Linux has a reputation for being more user-friendly than OpenBSD, with more graphical interfaces, tools, and applications available out of the box. OpenBSD has a more minimalistic approach, and users may need to spend more time configuring and customizing the system to suit their needs.

Performance: OpenBSD has a reputation for being a fast and efficient operating system, with low overhead and minimal resource usage. Linux can also be optimized for performance, but may require more fine-tuning and tweaking to achieve the same level of efficiency.

Ultimately, the choice between Linux and OpenBSD will depend on factors such as the user's technical expertise, the specific use case and hardware requirements, the desired level of security and privacy, and personal preferences. Both operating systems have their own strengths and weaknesses, and both are viable options for users who want an open-source, community-driven operating system.
What is are some of the weirder Linux distributions?