Are viruses considered to be living organisms?
The classification of viruses as living or non-living organisms has been a subject of debate among scientists for a long time. Viruses possess certain characteristics that are common to living organisms, such as the presence of genetic material (DNA or RNA) and the ability to reproduce and evolve. However, they also exhibit features that are distinct from living organisms, such as the lack of cellular structure and the inability to carry out metabolic processes or replicate independently.

Viruses require host cells to reproduce, as they rely on the host cell's machinery to synthesize their proteins and replicate their genetic material. This dependency on host cells is a key factor in the argument that viruses are not living organisms.

Overall, whether viruses are considered living or non-living depends on the specific criteria used to define life. Some scientists argue that viruses are at the boundary between living and non-living entities, possessing characteristics of both.
How fascinating. Please elaborate on the argument that viruses are at the boundary between living and non-living entities.