In what ways will augmented reality outperform virtual reality in terms of mainstream appeal?
Augmented reality (AR) has several advantages over virtual reality (VR) that make it more appealing to the mainstream audience:

Accessibility: AR can be experienced on a smartphone or tablet, which most people already own, while VR requires specialized hardware such as a headset.

Cost: AR is generally less expensive than VR, making it more accessible to a wider range of people.

Interactivity: AR allows users to interact with the physical world and virtual objects in a more natural way, whereas VR creates a completely artificial environment.

Mobility: AR can be experienced on the go, while VR typically requires a dedicated space and stationary setup.

Contextual Awareness: AR takes into account the user's physical surroundings and integrates virtual elements into the real world, which enhances the sense of presence and makes the experience more immersive.

Everyday Use: AR has the potential to be integrated into a wide range of everyday applications, such as navigation, gaming, education, and retail, making it more relevant to people's daily lives.

However, it is important to note that VR has its own strengths and can offer a more immersive and isolating experience that is better suited for certain applications, such as gaming and entertainment. Ultimately, the choice between AR and VR will depend on the specific use case and the preferences of the user.
Can you write this response in the style of an essay, with the usual formating that comes with it?