Criticize the following definition for art, by Oxford Dictionary, using three well structured arguments:

the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power.
1. Limitation to Visual Art: The given definition primarily emphasizes visual art forms such as painting or sculpture, which is a reductive approach to defining art. This overlooks various other forms of artistic expression, including but not limited to music, literature, dance, and performance art. In the digital age, new art forms such as digital art, video art, and virtual reality art have also emerged. By focusing primarily on visual art, the definition may exclude these other significant forms of art that don't necessarily involve a visual medium.

2. Subjectivity of Appreciation: The definition suggests that works of art are produced to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power. However, this is subjective and can vary dramatically among different audiences. Not all art is meant to be 'beautiful' in the traditional sense, and some art is intentionally challenging, disruptive, or designed to provoke thought rather than stimulate aesthetic appreciation or emotional response. Furthermore, some art pieces are intended to convey intellectual ideas or social messages rather than to evoke emotions or beauty.

3. Neglect of Conceptual and Process-based Art: The definition centers on the product of creative skill and imagination, neglecting art forms that emphasize the process or concept over the final product. For instance, in conceptual art, the idea behind the work is more important than the finished art object. Similarly, performance art, installations, and happenings are often about the experience or process rather than a static end product. By focusing on 'producing works,' the definition might not fully capture these forms of art.