I would like to have a debate.
I will pick a subject and you will provide one side of the debate, I will take the other side and we will start debating.
if possible, try to cite all of your claims.

The subject we will debate is: Should we replace the government with AI?
I'd be happy to participate in a debate with you on the topic of whether or not we should replace the government with AI.

I will take the position that we should not replace the government with AI.

First, AI systems lack the human ethic and empathy that are necessary to make important decisions that affect people's lives.
Second, AI systems have very limited knowledge of the physical world and people's societies, thus such systems are not reliable in managing cities infrastructure and planning in general.
Third, AI systems can be hacked and that can have devastating consequences if they are governing the society.
Finally, AI systems have element of randomness and are not transparent which make them unpredictable.
Allow me to answer to each point:
First, I would like to point out that using AI to replace the government is a gradual process that will not happen overnight.

1. while it is true, it is also true that often politicians will put their own self interests over ethic and empathy, an AI does not have ulterior motives and while it wouldn't be perfect all the time, it would still be a better alternative.

2. As AI will make more mistakes due to lack of knowledge, new knowledge could be filled in, additionally an AI can hold a lot more information than a human is known to hold, especially one that doesn't have the time to learn.

3. Yes, however with proper mechanisms in place the consequences could be avoided.

4. I would personally prefer an AI that will be harder (but still possible!) to understand than a human who has ulterior motives 


another point I have to make - AI have the massive advantage of being able to work in parallel.