Can you compare GraphQL with REST API?
GraphQL and REST are both protocols a client can use to request information from a server.

The advantages of GraphQL:
- Requires fewer requests than REST, reducing latency
- Saves bandwidth by allowing the client to request only the information it is interested in
- Easier for rapid prototyping, because there is no need to specify all possible requests in advance

The advantages of REST:
- More efficient when the types of requests are known
- Better suited for caching
- More widely used than GraphQL
- Simpler to implement
Can you provide context to these insights?
Sure, here's some additional context to those insights:

- GraphQL is a query language for APIs that was first introduced in 2013 by Facebook. Unlike other API protocols such as REST, GraphQL allows clients to request only the specific data they want in a single query, as opposed to having to make multiple requests to retrieve data from various resources. This can significantly reduce the number of network requests required and help improve the performance and latency of an application. Another advantage of GraphQL is that it is easier to prototype with, as developers don't need to strictly define all possible requests in advance. This can be useful for rapidly developing and testing new features.

- REST, on the other hand, is an architectural style for creating Web services that was introduced by Roy Fielding in 2000. It is now a well-established and widely used protocol for building APIs. While GraphQL has some advantages over REST, such as reducing the number of network requests required and being easier to prototype with, REST has its own advantages. One is that it is more efficient when the types of requests are known, and that it is better suited for caching. REST is also more widely used that GraphQL, and is easier to implement and understand.

In summary, both protocols have their own benefits and drawbacks. GraphQL is a high-level query language that can significantly reduce the number of network requests required, making it well-suited for applications that need to handle large sets of data or perform many operations quickly. REST, on the other hand, is an architectural style that is well-established, widely used, and more efficient when the types of requests are known. As such, the choice between GraphQL and REST will depend on the specific requirements and constraints of the application.
Ok, can you give me an easy to understand example explaining the two architectures instead? Include a visual like representation of the requests that are made in a given example case.