Is the self an illusion?
The nature of the self is a complex and multifaceted topic that has been debated by philosophers, scientists, and scholars for centuries. While there is no single consensus on the definition or existence of the self, some philosophical and scientific theories suggest that the self may be an illusion.

One such theory is the idea of no-self or anatta in Buddhism, which suggests that the self is a construct of the mind and does not exist as a permanent, independent entity. According to this view, the self is made up of ever-changing thoughts, feelings, and perceptions that arise and pass away in each moment. Therefore, the self is seen as an illusion or a mistaken belief in a fixed and unchanging entity.

In the realm of cognitive science and neuroscience, some theories also suggest that the self may be an illusion created by the brain. For example, the theory of the illusion of conscious will proposes that our sense of agency and control over our actions is a product of post-hoc rationalization, rather than a direct experience of our own willpower.

However, it is important to note that the question of whether the self is an illusion is still a topic of ongoing debate and research. Different philosophical and scientific perspectives offer varying explanations and theories on the nature of the self, and there is still much to be discovered about the workings of the human mind and consciousness.
What are some recent studies on the subject?