Please explain the difference between absurdism and nihilism
- Nihilists, specifically passive nihilists, believe that there’s **no intrinsic meaning in life** and “it is futile to seek or to affirm meaning where none can be found”. That’s where the philosophy essentially ends. 
- Absurdists, on the other hand, hesitantly **allow the possibility for some meaning or value** in life.
Can you please elaborate on absurdism?
Absurdism is a philosophical belief that acknowledges the human search for meaning in a universe that appears to be devoid of it. According to absurdism, the world has no inherent meaning or purpose, and any attempt to find meaning in it is ultimately futile.

However, unlike passive nihilism, absurdism does not stop there. Absurdists recognize that humans have an innate desire for meaning and purpose, and that this desire cannot be easily dismissed. As a result, they acknowledge the possibility of meaning and value in life, even if it may seem contradictory to the meaningless nature of the universe.

The central idea in absurdism is the concept of the absurd, which refers to the disconnect between the human need for meaning and the universe's lack of meaning. The absurd can manifest in different ways, such as the feeling of disorientation and confusion that arises when one realizes the fundamental absurdity of existence.

Despite the absurdity of existence, absurdists do not advocate for despair or nihilism. Instead, they encourage individuals to embrace the absurd and find meaning and purpose in their lives, even if it may seem arbitrary or irrational. This can be done through acts of rebellion against the meaningless nature of the universe, creating one's own meaning and purpose, or finding joy and beauty in the small moments of life.

In summary, absurdism acknowledges the human search for meaning in a meaningless universe, but also recognizes the possibility of finding value and purpose in life through embracing the absurd.