Do you think that Free Will conflicts with what we now know about the brain from neuroscience?
There is ongoing debate among neuroscientists and philosophers about the relationship between free will and the brain. Some argue that free will is incompatible with a deterministic view of the brain, while others suggest that free will may still exist in some form. The answer to your question will depend on your personal beliefs and interpretations of the available evidence.
How can we reconcile the concept of free will with the increasing evidence that our thoughts and actions are influenced by neural processes outside of our conscious awareness?
The relationship between free will and neuroscience is complex, and there is no one definitive answer to this question. However, some scholars suggest that we can still reconcile the concept of free will with our growing understanding of the brain by adopting a compatibilist perspective.

Compatibilism is the view that free will is compatible with determinism, or the idea that all events, including our thoughts and actions, are determined by prior causes. According to this view, our ability to make choices and act on them is not threatened by the fact that our neural processes are influenced by factors outside of our conscious awareness.

For example, we may not be aware of all the neural processes that go into making a decision, but we still have the ability to deliberate, consider various options, and make a choice based on our own values and preferences. While our decisions may be influenced by factors outside of our conscious awareness, they are ultimately still our own choices.

In short, the concept of free will can be reconciled with the increasing evidence from neuroscience by adopting a compatibilist perspective, which emphasizes the importance of personal agency and decision-making in the face of deterministic processes in the brain.