Why is the ability for people to think and speak freely so important? why must it be protected and to what extent? who should decide when someone's speech or ideas are not acceptable or are too extreme?
The ability for people to think and speak freely is important for several reasons:

Individual autonomy: Freedom of thought and speech allows individuals to express their beliefs, opinions, and emotions without fear of censorship or punishment. This fosters personal growth, self-expression, and a sense of identity.

Marketplace of ideas: Free speech promotes the open exchange of ideas, facilitating innovation, and intellectual progress. By exposing society to a diverse range of viewpoints, individuals can weigh the merits of different perspectives and make more informed decisions.

Democratic values: Free speech is a cornerstone of democratic societies. It enables citizens to participate in public discourse, voice dissent, and hold those in power accountable. This leads to a more transparent, responsive, and representative government.

Social progress: Open discussion of social issues can lead to societal progress and help address injustices. By allowing individuals to challenge prevailing norms and beliefs, society can evolve and adapt to new circumstances and understandings.

Protecting free speech is essential, but it is not absolute. There are limits to free speech, such as incitement to violence, hate speech, defamation, and obscenity. These limits are in place to balance the rights of individuals and maintain public order and safety.

Determining when someone's speech or ideas are not acceptable or too extreme can be challenging. In general, it is the responsibility of the legal system and society to establish and enforce these boundaries. The specific criteria may vary from one jurisdiction to another, but the key principle is to balance the protection of individual rights with the greater good of society.

Laws and regulations should be guided by principles such as proportionality, necessity, and non-discrimination. In democratic societies, the role of the judiciary, lawmakers, and the public is crucial in shaping and refining the rules surrounding free speech, ensuring that these limits are reasonable and justified. Public debate and scrutiny are essential in this process to maintain a balanced and evolving understanding of free speech and its limits.
So is this why shadow banning is so bad?