What are some reasons people argue against right to repair?
There are several reasons why some people argue against the right to repair. Here are a few of them:

    1. Safety concerns: Some manufacturers argue that allowing consumers to repair their own products could be dangerous, 
       especially for more complex products such as smartphones or cars. 
       They claim that repairs performed by untrained individuals could result in accidents, injury, or even death.

    2. Intellectual property protection: Manufacturers often argue that their products are protected by intellectual property rights, 
       and that consumers should not be able to modify or repair them without their permission. 
       They may claim that unauthorized repairs could violate their patents, copyrights, or trademarks, and harm their ability to make a profit.

    3. Quality control: Manufacturers may argue that they have quality control standards that must be followed in order to maintain 
       the safety and reliability of their products. 
       They claim that allowing repairs to be done by untrained individuals could compromise the quality of the repairs and the overall safety of the product.

    4. Cost: Manufacturers may argue that allowing consumers to repair their own products could actually increase costs, 
       as it could result in more product returns, more warranty claims, and increased liability.

    5. Obsolescence: Some argue that the right to repair could actually make it harder for manufacturers to innovate and create new products, 
       as it could result in consumers holding onto their existing products for longer periods of time. 
       This could reduce demand for new products, and ultimately harm the economy.
Can you give me some examples of companies that support and some that are against right to repair?