Why would one use a seqlock for the reader-writer problem in concurrent programs?
A seqlock is a synchronization mechanism used in concurrent programming to manage shared data between a writer thread and multiple reader threads. It is a lightweight lock that avoids the use of expensive operations such as locking and unlocking, and instead relies on a simple compare-and-swap operation to control access to the shared data.

A seqlock consists of a sequence counter and a data structure. When a writer thread wants to modify the shared data, it increments the sequence counter and modifies the data structure. At the end of the modification, the writer thread increments the sequence counter again. Meanwhile, reader threads can access the shared data by reading the data structure and the sequence counter. If the reader thread observes that the sequence counter has changed during the read operation, it knows that the shared data might have been modified and should re-read the data.

One advantage of using a seqlock over other synchronization mechanisms such as mutexes or semaphores is that it reduces contention between reader and writer threads. In particular, reader threads can access the shared data without blocking, which can improve overall performance in situations where there are more readers than writers.

However, seqlocks have some limitations. For example, they are not suitable for situations where the shared data is large, or where the writer thread modifies the shared data frequently. In such cases, the seqlock's compare-and-swap operation can become a bottleneck, leading to poor performance.

In summary, seqlocks can be a useful tool for managing shared data in concurrent programs, especially when there are many reader threads and few writer threads, and the shared data is small and not modified frequently. However, it's important to evaluate the trade-offs carefully before choosing a synchronization mechanism for a particular application.
Show me a real world example of how you would use the seqlock algorithm.