New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cannot access Mendeley.com #94

Closed
magnli10 opened this Issue Feb 3, 2015 · 43 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
6 participants
@magnli10

magnli10 commented Feb 3, 2015

Hello,
I had major issues with the local bib not syncronizing with mendeley.com. It would always return the message that everything is up to date when trying to import newly added articles. Note the first import worked like a charm.
In an attempt to fix the issue I set the "cache": { "mendeley": 0 }.
Now I get

Cannot access Mendeley.com, please check docs.latexing.com for more details.

I could not find any information in the docs about troubleshooting api access. Tried resubscribing to the mendeley api but still have the same issue.

I use Latexing 1.2.4 and ST build 3065

@adamaltmejd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@adamaltmejd

adamaltmejd commented Feb 5, 2015

Same here!

@csch0 csch0 added the bug label Feb 5, 2015

@csch0 csch0 self-assigned this Feb 5, 2015

@csch0 csch0 added the on roadmap label Feb 5, 2015

@mikeoconnor0308

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mikeoconnor0308

mikeoconnor0308 Feb 5, 2015

This is affecting me too, main feature for me!

mikeoconnor0308 commented Feb 5, 2015

This is affecting me too, main feature for me!

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 5, 2015

Contributor

Working on this right now. A new testing version should be available tonight, if you would like to take part of the testing process stay tuned.

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 5, 2015

Working on this right now. A new testing version should be available tonight, if you would like to take part of the testing process stay tuned.

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 5, 2015

Contributor

OK testing version is online, just have a look and give some feedback

http://testing.latexing.com/packages.json

The API changed a lot so needs to be tested.

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 5, 2015

OK testing version is online, just have a look and give some feedback

http://testing.latexing.com/packages.json

The API changed a lot so needs to be tested.

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 5, 2015

Contributor

Please make sure you enabled the "install_prereleases" of package control (https://packagecontrol.io/docs/settings). Check the version number after updating... should be 1.2.5-rc.1

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 5, 2015

Please make sure you enabled the "install_prereleases" of package control (https://packagecontrol.io/docs/settings). Check the version number after updating... should be 1.2.5-rc.1

@magnli10

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@magnli10

magnli10 Feb 6, 2015

This fixed the import issue for me, thanks! My version check says 1.2.3 even though the package control says 1.2.5-rc1 when i did the upgrade.

For others, like me, who are new to the sublime package control you can simply put this

{ 
    "install_prereleases": ["LaTeXing"] ,
    "repositories": ["http://testing.latexing.com/packages.json"] 
} 

in your Package Control.sublime-settings file, then run package control upgrade from the command palette.

magnli10 commented Feb 6, 2015

This fixed the import issue for me, thanks! My version check says 1.2.3 even though the package control says 1.2.5-rc1 when i did the upgrade.

For others, like me, who are new to the sublime package control you can simply put this

{ 
    "install_prereleases": ["LaTeXing"] ,
    "repositories": ["http://testing.latexing.com/packages.json"] 
} 

in your Package Control.sublime-settings file, then run package control upgrade from the command palette.

@pujan14

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pujan14

pujan14 Feb 7, 2015

This fixed import issue but there are some new issues. There is no book title/journal name field, also there are now two fields issn and isbn both containing exactly same data. For me main issue is lack of book title/journal name

pujan14 commented Feb 7, 2015

This fixed import issue but there are some new issues. There is no book title/journal name field, also there are now two fields issn and isbn both containing exactly same data. For me main issue is lack of book title/journal name

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 8, 2015

Contributor

Yes thats possible, like I said API changed a lot and need much more testings to be stable.

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 8, 2015

Yes thats possible, like I said API changed a lot and need much more testings to be stable.

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 15, 2015

Contributor

Any further problems found?

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 15, 2015

Any further problems found?

@pujan14

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pujan14

pujan14 Feb 16, 2015

I didn’t notice any other issues.

On 15 Feb 2015, at 09:50, csch0 notifications@github.com wrote:

Any further problems found?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #94 (comment).

pujan14 commented Feb 16, 2015

I didn’t notice any other issues.

On 15 Feb 2015, at 09:50, csch0 notifications@github.com wrote:

Any further problems found?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #94 (comment).

@adamaltmejd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@adamaltmejd

adamaltmejd Feb 16, 2015

Works for me too!

adamaltmejd commented Feb 16, 2015

Works for me too!

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 16, 2015

Nice, will there be a new version really soon then?

minihessel commented Feb 16, 2015

Nice, will there be a new version really soon then?

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 16, 2015

Contributor

Sure

On 16 Feb 2015, at 13:55, minihessel notifications@github.com wrote:

Nice, will there be a new version really soon then?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 16, 2015

Sure

On 16 Feb 2015, at 13:55, minihessel notifications@github.com wrote:

Nice, will there be a new version really soon then?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 16, 2015

Great, have a lot of comments that basically say %cite xxx here % :)

minihessel commented Feb 16, 2015

Great, have a lot of comments that basically say %cite xxx here % :)

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 23, 2015

Still can't see a new version, any update Chris? :)

minihessel commented Feb 23, 2015

Still can't see a new version, any update Chris? :)

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 23, 2015

Contributor

Had to address one other issue with a different user over the weekend. Solved this and will push a new version tonight. Thanks. :)

On 23 Feb 2015, at 08:44, minihessel notifications@github.com wrote:

Still can't see a new version, any update Chris? :)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 23, 2015

Had to address one other issue with a different user over the weekend. Solved this and will push a new version tonight. Thanks. :)

On 23 Feb 2015, at 08:44, minihessel notifications@github.com wrote:

Still can't see a new version, any update Chris? :)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 23, 2015

A, great! Have so many %cite here% comments now, haha.

minihessel commented Feb 23, 2015

A, great! Have so many %cite here% comments now, haha.

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 24, 2015

screen shot 2015-02-24 at 08 40 00

New version throws you to localhost, and the key parsed in the URL isn't valid.

Mendeley writes about how to parse this here : http://dev.mendeley.com/reference/topics/authorization_implicit.html

minihessel commented Feb 24, 2015

screen shot 2015-02-24 at 08 40 00

New version throws you to localhost, and the key parsed in the URL isn't valid.

Mendeley writes about how to parse this here : http://dev.mendeley.com/reference/topics/authorization_implicit.html

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 24, 2015

Contributor

Oh, sorry for that. A new fix will come tonight then. :)

On 24 Feb 2015, at 08:54, minihessel notifications@github.com wrote:

New version throws you to localhost, and the key parsed in the URL isn't valid.

Mentally writes about how to parse this here : http://dev.mendeley.com/reference/topics/authorization_implicit.html


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 24, 2015

Oh, sorry for that. A new fix will come tonight then. :)

On 24 Feb 2015, at 08:54, minihessel notifications@github.com wrote:

New version throws you to localhost, and the key parsed in the URL isn't valid.

Mentally writes about how to parse this here : http://dev.mendeley.com/reference/topics/authorization_implicit.html


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 24, 2015

Contributor

OK I think there is a problem with the Mendeley service. It was definitely working last week, dropped them an Email and will keep you updated asap.

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 24, 2015

OK I think there is a problem with the Mendeley service. It was definitely working last week, dropped them an Email and will keep you updated asap.

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 25, 2015

Any updates? I really need this citation function, I'm sorry!

minihessel commented Feb 25, 2015

Any updates? I really need this citation function, I'm sorry!

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 25, 2015

Contributor

Yes I am also sorry about that. The testing version was working last week and now it looks like Mendeley changed something. Cannot do more than working on it and talk to the support as well.

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 25, 2015

Yes I am also sorry about that. The testing version was working last week and now it looks like Mendeley changed something. Cannot do more than working on it and talk to the support as well.

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 25, 2015

I understand, will be watching the thread for updates. Cheering on you!

Have you seen this: http://dev.mendeley.com/reference/topics/authorization_auth_code.html btw?

minihessel commented Feb 25, 2015

I understand, will be watching the thread for updates. Cheering on you!

Have you seen this: http://dev.mendeley.com/reference/topics/authorization_auth_code.html btw?

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 25, 2015

Did Mendely answer you? They never answered me when asking about it.

minihessel commented Feb 25, 2015

Did Mendely answer you? They never answered me when asking about it.

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 25, 2015

Contributor

Nope not so far, but seriously working on it. Should be a fix before the weekend. I am really sorry for this!

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 25, 2015

Nope not so far, but seriously working on it. Should be a fix before the weekend. I am really sorry for this!

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 26, 2015

Ah, nice with a fix before the weekend. No problem :)

minihessel commented Feb 26, 2015

Ah, nice with a fix before the weekend. No problem :)

@mikeoconnor0308

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mikeoconnor0308

mikeoconnor0308 Feb 26, 2015

Seems to be working for me now? Thanks for all your hard work on this.

mikeoconnor0308 commented Feb 26, 2015

Seems to be working for me now? Thanks for all your hard work on this.

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 26, 2015

Perhaps because your Mendely already is authorised ? If you remove the oath token, you won't be able to authorise Latexing again.

minihessel commented Feb 26, 2015

Perhaps because your Mendely already is authorised ? If you remove the oath token, you won't be able to authorise Latexing again.

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 27, 2015

screen shot 2015-02-27 at 16 09 37

Finally got a hold of Mendeley, they will be answering you ASAP @csch0

minihessel commented Feb 27, 2015

screen shot 2015-02-27 at 16 09 37

Finally got a hold of Mendeley, they will be answering you ASAP @csch0

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 27, 2015

Contributor

Thanks @minihessel I also got a response today which is saying:

@david do you mind replying to this, I've let it drop.

Thanks

Great support so far ^^ we will see.

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 27, 2015

Thanks @minihessel I also got a response today which is saying:

@david do you mind replying to this, I've let it drop.

Thanks

Great support so far ^^ we will see.

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 27, 2015

Haha, seriously? Guess a "fix" won't be available that soon after all, since they can't even provide support for their API :/

minihessel commented Feb 27, 2015

Haha, seriously? Guess a "fix" won't be available that soon after all, since they can't even provide support for their API :/

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Feb 27, 2015

Contributor

Don't worry, will be fixed soon. Found a way around it, just needed to reimplement the oauth2 in LaTeXing.

Contributor

csch0 commented Feb 27, 2015

Don't worry, will be fixed soon. Found a way around it, just needed to reimplement the oauth2 in LaTeXing.

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Feb 27, 2015

Okey, cheers for you !

minihessel commented Feb 27, 2015

Okey, cheers for you !

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Mar 1, 2015

Real close now @csch0 , the auth page works, just not the key you get :P

minihessel commented Mar 1, 2015

Real close now @csch0 , the auth page works, just not the key you get :P

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Mar 1, 2015

Contributor

Yes.. really close. :) Thanks

Contributor

csch0 commented Mar 1, 2015

Yes.. really close. :) Thanks

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Mar 1, 2015

Just wanted to say that I truly appreciate all the time you put down in this @csch0 . A thank you from me! *purchase coffee for @csch0 *

minihessel commented Mar 1, 2015

Just wanted to say that I truly appreciate all the time you put down in this @csch0 . A thank you from me! *purchase coffee for @csch0 *

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Mar 2, 2015

Contributor

Ok, so I think everything is online now. Steps you need to do @minihessel to make me happy :)

0.) Remove the old oauthlib package, its working slightly different now.
1.) Make sure you are using the latest package control version (v3.0.1)
2.) Please add to package control add simply add this:

{ 
    "install_prereleases": ["LaTeXing"] ,
    "repositories": ["http://testing.latexing.com/packages.json"] 
} 

3.) Install LaTeXing (should be 1.2.7-rc1)
4.) Wait for package control and restart Sublime Text
5.) Give it a go.. hopefully it will work. :)

Contributor

csch0 commented Mar 2, 2015

Ok, so I think everything is online now. Steps you need to do @minihessel to make me happy :)

0.) Remove the old oauthlib package, its working slightly different now.
1.) Make sure you are using the latest package control version (v3.0.1)
2.) Please add to package control add simply add this:

{ 
    "install_prereleases": ["LaTeXing"] ,
    "repositories": ["http://testing.latexing.com/packages.json"] 
} 

3.) Install LaTeXing (should be 1.2.7-rc1)
4.) Wait for package control and restart Sublime Text
5.) Give it a go.. hopefully it will work. :)

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Mar 2, 2015

Okay, i believe it works ! 👯

Couple of questions:

  1. Did LateXing install a newer version of oathlib?
  2. So this is a beta, and it will be released official in the next couple of days?
  3. If I write up a lot of citations now, they will still work when the official release comes?

minihessel commented Mar 2, 2015

Okay, i believe it works ! 👯

Couple of questions:

  1. Did LateXing install a newer version of oathlib?
  2. So this is a beta, and it will be released official in the next couple of days?
  3. If I write up a lot of citations now, they will still work when the official release comes?
@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Mar 2, 2015

Contributor

Yes latexing is using a function of package control to define common libraries. It's a more elegant ways since you don't have to install multiple packages manually.

Yes will be released tonight as stable version then. In general there shouldn't be an issue by using this version. Go ahead and let me know in case of a problem.

Contributor

csch0 commented Mar 2, 2015

Yes latexing is using a function of package control to define common libraries. It's a more elegant ways since you don't have to install multiple packages manually.

Yes will be released tonight as stable version then. In general there shouldn't be an issue by using this version. Go ahead and let me know in case of a problem.

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Mar 2, 2015

Will be testing for some hours :)

minihessel commented Mar 2, 2015

Will be testing for some hours :)

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel Mar 2, 2015

Report: it works great.

minihessel commented Mar 2, 2015

Report: it works great.

@csch0

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csch0

csch0 Mar 2, 2015

Contributor

Thanks for the feedback and its stable now in 1.2.8.

Contributor

csch0 commented Mar 2, 2015

Thanks for the feedback and its stable now in 1.2.8.

@csch0 csch0 closed this Mar 2, 2015

@csch0 csch0 removed the on roadmap label Mar 2, 2015

@minihessel

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minihessel

minihessel commented Mar 2, 2015

Cheers for @csch0 !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment