Skip to content

indexing #77

cadrian opened this Issue Mar 29, 2013 · 4 comments

3 participants

Liberty Eiffel member
cadrian commented Mar 29, 2013

add indexing on features


Why not depreciate "indexing" and replace it by "note" ?

Liberty Eiffel member
ramack commented Apr 10, 2013

I don't care about such naming. "note" is as good as "indexing" - for a first time implementation it may be a bit better to have "note", but as there already is eiffel code using "indexing" it's a bit worse to have "note". As "note" is the ECMA notation, I'd vote for this.

  • add support for "note" in the compiler
  • add "note" it in check assertions as defined in ECMA 8.9.17
  • add note clauses in our libs
  • replace "indexing" by "note" in the wrapper generator
  • add handling of "note" in eiffeldoc

So I think this will not make it into adler and not even bell.
@cadrian to add "indexing" on features you thought of putting it between "is" (or "obsolete", if available) and the precondition, right?

Liberty Eiffel member
cadrian commented Apr 10, 2013

Yes. Anyway "is" could become optional as ECMA removed it. (see #90).

@ramack ramack referenced this issue May 19, 2013

clearification of cluster.rc #112

0 of 5 tasks complete
Liberty Eiffel member
cadrian commented Jun 7, 2013
@cadrian cadrian closed this Jun 7, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.