Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Fixed issue #13901: Prefilling single choice prefill other and comment
New feature : allow to use EM code for subquestions in prefilling Dev: Less for inside for, use LimeExpressionManager::getLEMqcode2sgqa Dev: remove unneeded part in getLEMqcode2sgqa (no need to set in all in one mode)
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
24 additions
and
16 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bb2be15
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Denis, can you give an example for "allow to use EM code for subquestions in prefilling"? Does that refer to the "default answers" feature or is it something different?
bb2be15
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No , it's for prefilling value only
https://manual.limesurvey.org/index.php?title=URL_fields&type=revision&diff=121536&oldid=111562
bb2be15
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi! It might be better if you link to a mantis feature ticket when doing a new feature. The new feature introduced a bug, it seems (https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=14008) - we want to fix it, but of course without breaking the new feature. But how can we test the new feature without a proper description of it, including test cases and test surveys?
bb2be15
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@olleharstedt :
bb2be15
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ping @dominikvitt
bb2be15
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See 2a9d8c4 , not linked with this commit …