inconsistent between .fq.gz and .fastq?

[AMChalkie]

Strange as this may sound, I get different results when using a .fq.gz vs a .fastq file (when the .fastq is a zcat of original). I get different mappability results (0.018 ish vs the expected 85%).

Would be great if this was handled automatically and input from .fq.gz was handled correctly, or alternatively at least a warning that this might be what's happening.

Otherwise - very useful software thank you!

[hyunhwaj]

Dear @AMChalkie,

The current version does not support gzipped FASTQ file, so you need to unzip the files. But the suggestion will be great for the CB^2. I will start to add the function soon.

Thank you,

Hyun-Hwan Jeong

[hyunhwaj]

@AMChalkie, the current github version supports gzipped FASTQ files. I wonder you are willing to test the version and let me know if you have any problem with that.

Thank you!

Hyun-Hwan Jeong

[AMChalkie]

Yes that works fine now. I notice that mappability information is not printed during the process now, which I thought was a good feature previously.

[hyunhwaj]

@AMChalkie you should see the message if you set the verbose parameter as TRUE.

Thank you,

Hyun-Hwan Jeong

[hyunhwaj]

@AMChalkie, Can you test on it again? The version which you tested has an incompatibility issue with Windows OS. So, I made some changes and wonder the change doesn't cause any problem.

Thank you,

Hyun-Hwan Jeong