Skip to content

Conversation

@Kenzo-Wada
Copy link
Contributor

@Kenzo-Wada Kenzo-Wada commented Sep 30, 2025

before
Screenshot from 2025-09-30 13-29-25

after
Screenshot from 2025-09-30 13-23-58

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Simplified the Paragraph section in the Text component docs by removing extra separators around the typography example, resulting in a cleaner, less cluttered layout.
    • Improved readability and visual flow in the affected section without altering behavior or logic.
    • No functional changes; content and rendering remain the same aside from reduced visual dividers.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 30, 2025

@Kenzo-Wada is attempting to deploy a commit to the Retro UI Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Walkthrough

Removed two UI elements from the Paragraph section in content/docs/components/text.mdx by deleting \ <hr /> and \ <br /> surrounding the typography-p showcase. No logic, API, or control flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Docs UI cleanup
content/docs/components/text.mdx
Deleted \ <hr /> and \ <br /> around the typography-p showcase to reduce visual separators; rendering otherwise unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I nibbled at lines, a tidy delight,
Snipped an hr, a br—cleaner sight.
Paragraphs hop with softer grace,
White space whispers, a calmer place.
Thump-thump! says the doc—just right. 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title concisely and accurately reflects the primary change of removing extraneous lines from the documentation’s text component without introducing unrelated details, and it follows a clear conventional commit format.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 684ad89 and c99ad3f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • content/docs/components/text.mdx (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • content/docs/components/text.mdx

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🧪 Early access (Sonnet 4.5): enabled

We are currently testing the Sonnet 4.5 model, which is expected to improve code review quality. However, this model may lead to increased noise levels in the review comments. Please disable the early access features if the noise level causes any inconvenience.

Note:

  • Public repositories are always opted into early access features.
  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@ariflogs ariflogs merged commit 646eb1c into Logging-Studio:main Oct 1, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants