Permalink
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
Name already in use
A tag already exists with the provided branch name. Many Git commands accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior. Are you sure you want to create this branch?
misp-taxonomies/admiralty-scale/machinetag.json
Go to fileThis commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
106 lines (106 sloc)
3.66 KB
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
{ | |
"namespace": "admiralty-scale", | |
"description": "The Admiralty Scale or Ranking (also called the NATO System) is used to rank the reliability of a source and the credibility of an information. Reference based on FM 2-22.3 (FM 34-52) HUMAN INTELLIGENCE COLLECTOR OPERATIONS and NATO documents.", | |
"version": 5, | |
"predicates": [ | |
{ | |
"value": "source-reliability", | |
"expanded": "Source Reliability", | |
"exclusive": true | |
}, | |
{ | |
"value": "information-credibility", | |
"expanded": "Information Credibility", | |
"exclusive": true | |
} | |
], | |
"values": [ | |
{ | |
"predicate": "source-reliability", | |
"entry": [ | |
{ | |
"value": "a", | |
"expanded": "Completely reliable", | |
"description": "No doubt of authenticity, trustworthiness, or competency; has a history of complete reliability", | |
"numerical_value": 100 | |
}, | |
{ | |
"value": "b", | |
"expanded": "Usually reliable", | |
"description": "Minor doubt about authenticity, trustworthiness, or competency; has a history of valid information most of the time", | |
"numerical_value": 75 | |
}, | |
{ | |
"value": "c", | |
"expanded": "Fairly reliable", | |
"description": "Doubt of authenticity, trustworthiness, or competency but has provided valid information in the past", | |
"numerical_value": 50 | |
}, | |
{ | |
"value": "d", | |
"expanded": "Not usually reliable", | |
"description": "Significant doubt about authenticity, trustworthiness, or co mpetency but has provided valid information in the past", | |
"numerical_value": 25 | |
}, | |
{ | |
"value": "e", | |
"expanded": "Unreliable", | |
"description": "Lacking in authenticity, trustworthiness, and competency; history of invalid information", | |
"numerical_value": 0 | |
}, | |
{ | |
"value": "f", | |
"expanded": "Reliability cannot be judged", | |
"description": "No basis exists for evaluating the reliability of the source", | |
"numerical_value": 50 | |
}, | |
{ | |
"value": "g", | |
"expanded": "Deliberatly deceptive", | |
"numerical_value": 0 | |
} | |
] | |
}, | |
{ | |
"predicate": "information-credibility", | |
"entry": [ | |
{ | |
"value": "1", | |
"expanded": "Confirmed by other sources", | |
"description": "Confirmed by other independent sources; logical in itself; Consistent with other information on the subject", | |
"numerical_value": 100 | |
}, | |
{ | |
"value": "2", | |
"expanded": "Probably true", | |
"description": "Not confirmed; logical in itself; consistent with other information on the subject", | |
"numerical_value": 75 | |
}, | |
{ | |
"value": "3", | |
"expanded": "Possibly true", | |
"description": "Not confirmed; reasonably logical in itself; agrees with some other information on the subject", | |
"numerical_value": 50 | |
}, | |
{ | |
"value": "4", | |
"expanded": "Doubtful", | |
"description": "Not confirmed; possible but not logical ; no other information on the subject", | |
"numerical_value": 25 | |
}, | |
{ | |
"value": "5", | |
"expanded": "Improbable", | |
"description": "Not confirmed; not logical in itself; contradicted by other information on the subject", | |
"numerical_value": 0 | |
}, | |
{ | |
"value": "6", | |
"expanded": "Truth cannot be judged", | |
"description": "No basis exists for evaluating the validity of the information", | |
"numerical_value": 50 | |
} | |
] | |
} | |
] | |
} |