Skip to content

Conversation

@xylar
Copy link
Collaborator

@xylar xylar commented Mar 31, 2021

The MOC basins are given a date stamp like other regions. This will also make it easier to make masks for them in the same way we make other region masks.

@xylar xylar self-assigned this Mar 31, 2021
@xylar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xylar commented Mar 31, 2021

@milenaveneziani, do you just want to review this by inspection? No need to do any testing.

@xylar xylar requested a review from milenaveneziani March 31, 2021 17:38
Copy link
Collaborator

@milenaveneziani milenaveneziani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure. Looks good.

Comment on lines +56 to +57
'MOC Basins': {'prefix': 'mocBasins',
'date': '20210331',
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mask files without the southern transects will be named <mesh>_mocBasins20210331.nc. Then, the ones with the southern transect (calculated via MPAS-Tools) will be <mesh>_mocBasinsAndTransects20210331.nc. Does that seem right?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we need both? just _mocBasinsAndTransects would be enough in my view, since these masks are only used in the MOC and MHT am's?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As a practical consideration, at the moment I don't have a good way of checking if <mesh>_mocBasinsAndTransects20210331.nc and not creating <mesh>_mocBasins20210331.nc if it does. I'll have to think about how to do this without making things unnecessarily complicated.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Never mind, that's quite easy to handle.

@xylar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xylar commented Apr 4, 2021

Tested with MPAS-Analysis on QU480 and QU240wLI meshes. More testing will be performed after a release.

@xylar xylar merged commit 5b2d70c into MPAS-Dev:master Apr 4, 2021
@xylar xylar deleted the add_moc_with_datestamp branch April 4, 2021 21:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants