Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Capability: Animate the zooming of the map #160

Open
Malvoz opened this issue Sep 9, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Capability: Animate the zooming of the map #160

Malvoz opened this issue Sep 9, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
discussion: capability a specific capability or feature: should it be included? what details? should it be a requirement? section: client-side API Capabilities & use cases for client-side APIs status: placeholder there's a matching section heading / some text in the report, but it's far from complete

Comments

@Malvoz
Copy link
Member

Malvoz commented Sep 9, 2019

This issue is for discussion of the API capability “Animate the zooming of the map”.
@Malvoz Malvoz added discussion: capability a specific capability or feature: should it be included? what details? should it be a requirement? section: client-side API Capabilities & use cases for client-side APIs status: placeholder there's a matching section heading / some text in the report, but it's far from complete labels Sep 9, 2019
@NickFitz
Copy link
Contributor

NickFitz commented Aug 5, 2020

This is another that I think is now addressed by the version of Pan, zoom and re-centre in PR 218.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
discussion: capability a specific capability or feature: should it be included? what details? should it be a requirement? section: client-side API Capabilities & use cases for client-side APIs status: placeholder there's a matching section heading / some text in the report, but it's far from complete
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@NickFitz @Malvoz