Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Capability: Specify the style of a map #65

Open
NickFitz opened this issue Jun 14, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Capability: Specify the style of a map #65

NickFitz opened this issue Jun 14, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
discussion: capability a specific capability or feature: should it be included? what details? should it be a requirement? section: client-side API Capabilities & use cases for client-side APIs status: placeholder there's a matching section heading / some text in the report, but it's far from complete

Comments

@NickFitz
Copy link
Contributor

NickFitz commented Jun 14, 2019

This issue is for discussion of the required API capability “Specify the style of a map”.

@NickFitz NickFitz added discussion: capability a specific capability or feature: should it be included? what details? should it be a requirement? status: placeholder there's a matching section heading / some text in the report, but it's far from complete section: client-side API Capabilities & use cases for client-side APIs labels Jun 14, 2019
@AmeliaBR
Copy link
Member

AmeliaBR commented Jul 5, 2019

"style" might be too big a concept for a single capability. Are we talking about selecting between a set of alternative map layers from the server? Or about custom CSS styling of vector graphics? The APIs would be rather different between the two.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion: capability a specific capability or feature: should it be included? what details? should it be a requirement? section: client-side API Capabilities & use cases for client-side APIs status: placeholder there's a matching section heading / some text in the report, but it's far from complete
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants