Skip to content
This repository

node_mailer sucks #20

Marak opened this Issue February 07, 2011 · 11 comments

6 participants

Robert Malko Ivan Žužak Diogo Resende Mikeal Rogers Michał Thoma

Are any of the other mailer libraries good enough to warrant depreciating this library, or should we push forward?

Robert Malko

I like

Not a lot of followers yet but it is really feature packed and put together well.


It seems good, but I don't have much time to test throughly. I'll keep supporting this library until there is a clear better solution.

Ivan Žužak

Just noticed emailjs --

Marak commented April 17, 2011

Does anyone know which has the most solid SMTP implementation? I think the best course of action for the node_mailer project at this point would be to vendor one of the other libs for its SMTP library and then build a slightly friendly API on top that replicates the current node_mailer API.

Mikeal Rogers

SMTP alone isn't hard at all, but there are a ton of extensions people use that you'll want to implement.

Diogo Resende

Could you tell me some of them? I only see auth extensions as essential..

Marak commented April 18, 2011

Okay, it's been decided that this library will.....LIVE.

Backup troops are incoming with a new version in the next couple of weeks. The current version is operational, but I'd be wary of using it for sending any large lists or really important messages.

Marak commented May 18, 2011

New version of the library has been completed thanks to @bmeck and @andris9. There is a blog post coming soon explaining the changes. Until then, the code is all published and live...get at it!

Michał Thoma
balor commented May 25, 2011

I was testing several libraries and Nodemailer ( works for me.

Marak commented May 25, 2011

@balor We are using NodeMailer as a dep now, did you read the whole thread? I'm closing this now to avoid further confusion.

Marak closed this May 25, 2011
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.