This document is not yet complete. It's a draft and it's under heavy development. To help, please go into Issues and take part into the open available issues. Your opinions are really useful!
Arrangement for View Assets Pattern
- Introduction to the AVA Pattern
- /images/ Directory Convention
Introduction to the AVA Pattern
In the recent years, we’ve been seeing a lot of improvements on the organizational procedures for web applications. More specifically, the MVC Pattern, which greatly improved development speeds by imposing a well structured architecture. This allowed developers to feel at home with any application that uses the pattern.
The Model-View-Controller (MVC) Pattern is oriented to the back-end. There’s a specification about where to store your interface related code, the View, but there’s no real specification regarding how and where you should store your assets. This is where the Arrangement for View Assets (AVA) Pattern shines.
The AVA Pattern works side by side with the MVC Pattern. Both are framework and language agnostic, and independent of each other, but together you can achieve a better organization which will improve productivity, especially during advanced stages of the application.
Take this with a grain of salt and remember that you should always use what your team is accustomed to; these conventions may be modified to fit your project, however, try to follow the general idea about the structure.
For instance, you may want use snake_case over the dash-case naming pattern; these types of modifications are a matter of preference.
Why do we need the AVA Pattern?
You may think that there's a steep learning curve involved with the AVA Pattern however, this is not the case. The main objective of the AVA Pattern is to provide written documentation for you, and your team, to consult when in doubt about how to store your assets.
What do I get from the AVA Pattern, besides consistency?
The main plus you'll get from the AVA Pattern is consistency. And, that alone is something that is worth your time. Consistency is not something you should only want to achieve when you're working on a team, but it's something you should aim for, for your own sake.
Think of the following use cases:
- As a Freelancer
- The odds are that you're going to work alone on a project. You complete the project and months later you might need to get back in and support or change something. Chances are you completely forgot about the file structure and file names of the project. You'll spend some time trying to figure out your own code.
- As a member of a Development Team
- You're part of a team that has another front-end Engineer besides you. Everything is fine and dandy till he begins naming files under a completely different directory than the one you set. After some time you can notice who made what just by how it's stored.
- As a Team Leader
- You can instill some sort of structure for assets when working on multiple projects. This will allow assignment of team members to different projects, as needed, without having to worry about a team member learning a wildly different asset structure.
- As an Outsourcer
- Having different developers coming in and working on a code base on a contracted basis can create much confusion when it comes to the way that assets are handled. The AVA pattern will give a common way for different developers to save assets, and give you, the outsourcer, that much more control over your code.
Overview of the Structure.
Need to write some stuff here..
/images/ Directory Convention
Conventions save you from having to figure out how the project is structured. The following conventions are the result of testing and polishing rules on production environment over the years.
Grouping is important; especially when you're working with projects that have many assets. The following rule proposes a way to organize these files into an easy to navigate way.
RULE IF images FROM same GROUP > 5 store in new directory repeat RULE else store in root
This rule may loop a max of 3 times. Having too many levels is not advised since it may make everything more complex to mantain in the long run and will make your css file bigger.
Names for individual files should always be singular, even if they're sprites that contains several elements. This is, by convention, a good practice that is taken from other web related frameworks.
Sub-Directories a.k.a. Groups should be named in their plural form when possible. Remember, this only applies to directories. For files, use the singular variant.
This whole plural/singular paradigm is to follow web frameworks and database naming conventions; think of it as a general recomendation.
background files: bg(-group)?(-name) sprites: sp(-group)?(-name) buttons: bt(-group)?(-name) icons: ic(-group)?(-name) other: (group-)?(name)
When the file is going to have several variants, it's a good practice to append the change in type or dimension using the following pattern.
logo-300x.jpg logo-500x250.jpg logo-500x300.jpg logo-300x-grayscale.jpg
Notice that you're not forced to add the height when there's no variation to that file. The
x is still left in place to denote that we're talking about width and not height:
50x <- 50 width x50 <- 50 height
Need to document this further.
/bg-body.jpg /bg-content.jpg /bg-content-light.jpg /sp-main.jpg /ic-form-submit.jpg /placeholders/ content-big.jpg content-small.jpg content-medium.jpg user-display-100x.jpg user-display-200x.jpg video-medium.jpg
Previously /scripts/ - scripts was thought too general.
- It maches rails conventions.
- It's better than
Original Paper and Idea by Mario Ricalde. With the help of many people including: