Search failures to take an optional enumerator #38

mcowan opened this Issue Mar 19, 2012 · 1 comment


None yet
2 participants

mcowan commented Mar 19, 2012

This is because when you see the sub tree in a search failure the subtree is being generated after the failure, so we will not catch timing based failures.

This means that the enumerator will have to cache all the children that it enumerates over.

@ghost ghost assigned ferrous26 Mar 19, 2012


ferrous26 commented Apr 14, 2012

Not getting done for release. :(

@ghost ghost assigned ferrous26 Aug 13, 2012

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment