Skip to content

Conversation

@matthewwalsh0
Copy link
Member

@matthewwalsh0 matthewwalsh0 commented Nov 13, 2025

Major release of @metamask/transaction-pay-controller.
Minor release of @metamask/transaction-controller.


Note

Publishes @metamask/transaction-pay-controller 6.0.0 (breaking changes) and @metamask/transaction-controller 61.3.0 (adds gasFeeToken), and bumps dependents to ^61.3.0.

  • Release highlights
    • @metamask/transaction-pay-controller@6.0.0:
      • Always retrieve quote for Relay strategy when required token is Arbitrum USDC; getStrategy option is now synchronous.
    • @metamask/transaction-controller@61.3.0:
      • Adds optional gasFeeToken to addTransaction and addTransactionBatch; changelog links updated.
  • Dependency updates
    • Bump @metamask/transaction-controller to ^61.3.0 across packages: assets-controllers, bridge-controller, bridge-status-controller, earn-controller, eip-5792-middleware, gator-permissions-controller, network-enablement-controller, phishing-controller, shield-controller, subscription-controller, transaction-pay-controller, user-operation-controller (and yarn.lock).
  • Repo
    • Monorepo version set to 679.0.0 in root package.json.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit cf17551. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@matthewwalsh0 matthewwalsh0 marked this pull request as ready for review November 13, 2025 15:16
@matthewwalsh0 matthewwalsh0 requested review from a team as code owners November 13, 2025 15:16
@matthewwalsh0 matthewwalsh0 force-pushed the release/679.0.0 branch 2 times, most recently from 7071192 to cf17551 Compare November 13, 2025 15:21
Copy link
Member

@Gudahtt Gudahtt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@matthewwalsh0 matthewwalsh0 merged commit ba9a5cc into main Nov 13, 2025
271 checks passed
@matthewwalsh0 matthewwalsh0 deleted the release/679.0.0 branch November 13, 2025 15:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants