fix: deprecate mumbai and linea goerli

[sahar-fehri]

Description

PR to display a warning when a user switches to Mumbai network.
It also removes linea goerli network from being displayed in the test networks section by default.
It migrates users who are on linea goerli network to linea sepolia network.
It displays a warning msg when users switch to linea goerli

Related issues

Fixes:

Related ticket description for context:

Goal: For Linea Goerli, Polygon Mumbai, Op Goerli, Arb Goerli and Starknet Goerli, we need to fully deprecate them.
Starknet is not EVM compatible so we wont worry about it.

1: Add in deprecation message

2: Fully remove mention of them in code

3: Ensure that if a user tried to add / connect to a deprecated network, we tell them it is deprecated.

Key dates for Infura deprecation:

Linea Goerli deprecation: 4/18

Starknet Goerli deprecation: 4/11

Op/Arb: Already deprecated

Polygon Mumbai: TBD

Manual testing steps

1. Go to home page
2. Click on network selector, you should not see linea goerli
3. try switching to linea goerli or Mumbai: To switch to these networks, click on the navigation button in the wallet and type in: chainlist.org. Connect your wallet and you can look for the network you want to add then click on "add to metamask" button (see screenshot)

5. You should see a deprecation warning msg

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

Screen.Recording.2024-03-25.at.22.04.54.mov

After

Screen.Recording.2024-03-25.at.21.57.56.mov

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: a408eb1
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/50917c0a-2413-42f7-903b-413ae59ddb3c

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: ede413c
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/5351ef5f-4e75-4187-961d-92d58ef6c7b6

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 206eb5f
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/865b13ff-99d3-4aa9-bab9-6d4d7b05b3ea

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[NicolasMassart]

Nice work! Looks good to me.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 8e237b7
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/956ab559-d32f-48c8-9c1d-c06908589201

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 7189aa2
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/79564482-3fbc-473d-a86a-78c35b0a4945

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 73.07692% with 7 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 45.37%. Comparing base (3f17ad2) to head (7189aa2).

Files	Patch %	Lines
app/store/migrations/037.ts	81.81%	2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
app/components/Nav/Main/index.js	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9047      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   45.35%   45.37%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1272     1273       +1     
  Lines       31247    31273      +26     
  Branches     3189     3195       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        14171    14190      +19     
- Misses      16234    16239       +5     
- Partials      842      844       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
77.5% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[MarioAslau]

Looks good!

[sahar-fehri]

closing this one in favor of this #9224