-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 621
Document TunnelType parameter for New-NetIPsecRule #4053
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Added TunnelType parameter to New-NetIPsecRule documentation.
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
|
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft" |
|
Learn Build status updates of commit cda5ec2: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
|
Learn Build status updates of commit 8e677e4: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
|
@MicrosoftDocs/powershell-docs-engineers can this PR be reviewed and merged? |
|
@MicrosoftDocs/officedocs-admin can this PR be reviewed and merged? |
|
@MicrosoftDocs/windowsservercontent can this PR be reviewed and merged? |
dknappettmsft
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @dallasbrooks - please make minor corrections as per the comments.
Co-authored-by: dknappettmsft <49432665+dknappettmsft@users.noreply.github.com>
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
|
Learn Build status updates of commit 1157849: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
|
Learn Build status updates of commit fd0cfcc: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
Added TunnelType parameter to New-NetIPsecRule documentation.
PR Summary
Adding documentation for TunnelType parameter to the New-NetIPSecRule documentation.
PR Checklist