-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[METATICKET] Package-friendly configuration system (".d" support for rpm/deb based systems) #1677
Comments
Example of .d-pattern support |
|
|
(In #3030) Seems that include or source or import keyword help.
Another way - use /xxx.d/ directory and load files on name order (NN-xxxx patterns) see #1677. This look more promising.
But before do this it is necessary define read priority order or conflict resolution strategy (in documentation). See arguments in #3191. |
I gather related to /xxx.d/NN-xxxx issues. Don't miss priority issues when user want to use defined classes (#2773) or have conflicting entries (#3191).
Main reason to implement this enhancement is to give users ability to redefine system preferences. They are mostly fine but require little tweaks. With /xxx.d/NN-xxxx and symlink like:
user automatically get config updates with MC update, no need to reintegrate tweaks.
I see /usr/lib/mc/ext.d/XXX.sh and /usr/lib/mc/extfs.d/XXX already present in MC distribution. |
|
Important
This issue was migrated from Trac:
vlisivka
(@vlisivka)gavenkoa@….com
(@gavenkoa)Currently, mc requires to edit .ini files to add new plugin to MC VFS. After upgrade, all changes to these files will be lost.
The same problem is related to syntax highlighting files.
To solve that problem, ".d" pattern should be supported by MC configuration system. See example of .d-pattern implemented in C in attachment.
Note
Original attachments:
vlisivka
(@vlisivka) onOct 5, 2009 at 10:45 UTC
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: