Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix AttributeError: 'World' object has no attribute #237

merged 2 commits into from Oct 19, 2016


None yet
4 participants
Copy link

commented Oct 10, 2016

This pull request fixes #235 and makes the following type of command line interactions work again:

python worldengine --ice -n foo
python worldengine export

c-w added some commits Oct 10, 2016

Fix AttributeError in export command line
This is a partial fix for #235

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Oct 10, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 85.703% when pulling 6cd20ec on c-w:master into d7604c9 on Mindwerks:master.


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Oct 10, 2016

Current coverage is 80.67% (diff: 0.00%)

Merging #237 into master will not change coverage

@@             master       #237   diff @@
  Files            28         28          
  Lines          3819       3819          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches        764        764          
  Hits           3081       3081          
  Misses          546        546          
  Partials        192        192          

Powered by Codecov. Last update d7604c9...6cd20ec


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Oct 19, 2016

Thanks for this PR!

@ftomassetti ftomassetti merged commit 5be2ca0 into Mindwerks:master Oct 19, 2016

5 of 6 checks passed

codecov/patch 0.00% of diff hit (target 80.67%)
code-quality/landscape Code quality remained the same
codecov/project 80.67% remains the same compared to d7604c9
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
coverage/coveralls Coverage remained the same at 85.703%
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.