Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stack seems to be missing ... from either the package or the doco #2

Open
adamburkegh opened this issue Nov 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@adamburkegh
Copy link

Hi team

Not completely new to Haskell but new to the modern Haskell stack.

On the Haskell Platform home page, it says

A multi-OS distribution designed to get you up and running quickly, making it easy to focus on using Haskell. You get:
the Glasgow Haskell Compiler
the Cabal build system
the Stack tool for developing projects
support for profiling and code coverage analysis
35 core & widely-used packages

However when I use the choco build - which is the recommended one on that page, there's no Stack.

>choco list --localonly
Chocolatey v0.10.15
cabal 3.2.0.0
chocolatey 0.10.15
chocolatey-core.extension 1.3.5.1
ghc 8.10.2.1
haskell-dev 0.0.1
...

And sure enough when I have a look in haskell-dev.nuspec

        <dependencies>
            <dependency id="ghc-head" version="8.6.4" />
            <dependency id="cabal-head" version="3.0.0.0" />
            <dependency id="msys2" />
        </dependencies>

Not sure about the other profiling tools and packages either.

If this is an oversight, could it be included? If this is by design or a known limitation, could it be better advertised? It doesn't seem right to advertise a platform installer that is missing half the platform. Perhaps it is to be expected given it is version 0.0.1, but in that case, maybe it shouldn't be the advertised default? It's all fixable but certainly cost me some stuffing around, and I'm sure it is unnecessary hurdles for those new to Haskell.

Cheers for your community work, but would be great to clean this up. Adam

@adamburkegh
Copy link
Author

@LouisMach
Copy link

Commenting to say I also ran into this issue.

@Kerwin123
Copy link

Same here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants