Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test sql/src/test/BugTracker/Tests/ fails with "too many digits" #2590

monetdb-team opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 0 comments


Copy link

@monetdb-team monetdb-team commented Nov 30, 2020

Date: 2010-07-07 14:52:40 +0200
From: @drstmane
To: SQL devs <>
Version: 11.1.1 (Mar2011) [obsolete]
CC: @njnes

Last updated: 2011-04-28 16:25:33 +0200

Comment 14248

Date: 2010-07-07 14:52:40 +0200
From: @drstmane

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv: Gecko/20100622 Fedora/3.5.10-1.fc12 Firefox/3.5.10
Build Identifier:

test sql/src/test/BugTracker/Tests/ fails with
QUERY = SELECT f2(1,2,3);
ERROR = !ERROR: too many digits (3 > 2)

on all platform except Debian and Windows:

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:

see nightly testing results
run test yourself

Actual Results:

test fails, i.e., output differs from approved stable output

Expected Results:

test should work fine, i.e., output should match approved stable output

I'm not sure whether the fact that Debian and Windows are the only platforms without RDF support installed is related or pure coincidence...

Comment 14262

Date: 2010-07-07 23:25:26 +0200
From: @drstmane

The other difference between our Debian & Windows machines on the one side and all other machines on the other side is that Debian & Windows are single core (Debian) or run MonetDB on purpose single-threaded (--gdk_nr_threads=1 on Windows).

Comment 14379

Date: 2010-07-13 14:21:07 +0200
From: @drstmane

The test works fine when running single threaded ( -n1 ...); hence, the bug might well be related to mitosis/mergetable or dataflow.

Comment 14464

Date: 2010-07-18 09:40:00 +0200
From: @drstmane

Updated URL is:

Comment 14550

Date: 2010-07-28 10:51:04 +0200
From: @drstmane

Since today, i.e., most probably since this fix of bug #2626 ,
the error message does no longer occur:

However, the output still differs (slightly) between multi-threaded & single-threaded execution:

Comment 14835

Date: 2010-08-30 09:23:18 +0200
From: @sjoerdmullender

The Jun2010-SP2 version has been released.

Comment 15071

Date: 2010-10-19 15:49:55 +0200
From: @drstmane

With Jun2010, the multi-threaded output still differs from the single-threaded output; cf.,

With Oct2010, output appears to be as expected on all non-Windows systems (both single- & multi-threaded).
On Windows, the test times out as reported in

Comment 15674

Date: 2011-03-28 17:36:27 +0200
From: @sjoerdmullender

The Mar2011 version has been released.

Comment 15704

Date: 2011-03-30 13:02:38 +0200
From: @njnes

has been fixed (combination of fixes in the last weeks).

Comment 15745

Date: 2011-04-28 16:25:33 +0200
From: @sjoerdmullender

The Apr2011 release has been uploaded.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
1 participant