Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Date: 2012-07-24 19:40:19 +0200 From: @grobian To: SQL devs <> Version: 11.11.5 (Jul2012) CC: @drstmane
Last updated: 2012-08-23 10:14:40 +0200
Date: 2012-07-24 19:40:19 +0200 From: @grobian
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testweb/web/testchange.php?test=44753:7968805ec43d/GNU-Darwin-x86_64-propcheck/sql/mTests/test/BugTracker-2011/func_iter_vs_bulk.Bug-2826
last ok on default was 44062:8fc883b7fdef
Merge from Apr2012
Apr2012 branch suggests the test never ran correctly:
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testweb/web/testchange.php?test=44466:6cd986132b9e/GNU-Darwin-x86_64-propcheck/sql/mTests/test/BugTracker-2011/func_iter_vs_bulk.Bug-2826
Date: 2012-07-25 10:01:57 +0200 From: @drstmane
This is a known difference, i.e., variable IDs for barriers appear to differ between systems, but I/we could not recognize a simple pattern, yet; hence, they are treated as "minor differences".
Date: 2012-07-25 11:06:30 +0200 From: @grobian
this output seems to depend on the number of cores the system has available
Date: 2012-07-25 15:47:33 +0200 From: @drstmane
Changeset 93446c850c0a made by Stefan Manegold Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl in the MonetDB repo, refers to this bug.
For complete details, see http//devmonetdborg/hg/MonetDB?cmd=changeset;node=93446c850c0a
Changeset description:
func_iter_vs_bulk.Bug-2826: use sequential pipeline to ensure deterministic output also on multi-core systems This fixes bug #3132.
Date: 2012-08-23 10:14:40 +0200 From: @sjoerdmullender
Jul2012-SP1 has been released.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Date: 2012-07-24 19:40:19 +0200
From: @grobian
To: SQL devs <>
Version: 11.11.5 (Jul2012)
CC: @drstmane
Last updated: 2012-08-23 10:14:40 +0200
Comment 17566
Date: 2012-07-24 19:40:19 +0200
From: @grobian
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testweb/web/testchange.php?test=44753:7968805ec43d/GNU-Darwin-x86_64-propcheck/sql/mTests/test/BugTracker-2011/func_iter_vs_bulk.Bug-2826
last ok on default was 44062:8fc883b7fdef
Merge from Apr2012
Apr2012 branch suggests the test never ran correctly:
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testweb/web/testchange.php?test=44466:6cd986132b9e/GNU-Darwin-x86_64-propcheck/sql/mTests/test/BugTracker-2011/func_iter_vs_bulk.Bug-2826
Comment 17569
Date: 2012-07-25 10:01:57 +0200
From: @drstmane
This is a known difference, i.e., variable IDs for barriers appear to differ between systems, but I/we could not recognize a simple pattern, yet;
hence, they are treated as "minor differences".
Comment 17571
Date: 2012-07-25 11:06:30 +0200
From: @grobian
this output seems to depend on the number of cores the system has available
Comment 17573
Date: 2012-07-25 15:47:33 +0200
From: @drstmane
Changeset 93446c850c0a made by Stefan Manegold Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl in the MonetDB repo, refers to this bug.
For complete details, see http//devmonetdborg/hg/MonetDB?cmd=changeset;node=93446c850c0a
Changeset description:
Comment 17642
Date: 2012-08-23 10:14:40 +0200
From: @sjoerdmullender
Jul2012-SP1 has been released.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: