Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

timestamp transformation #6695

monetdb-team opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 0 comments

timestamp transformation #6695

monetdb-team opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 0 comments


Copy link

@monetdb-team monetdb-team commented Nov 30, 2020

Date: 2019-04-13 21:59:35 +0200
From: @mlkersten
To: MonetDB5 devs <>
Version: 11.31.13 (Aug2018-SP2)
CC: castro8583bennett

Last updated: 2019-11-28 10:00:06 +0100

Comment 26949

Date: 2019-04-13 21:59:35 +0200
From: @mlkersten

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:66.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/66.0
Build Identifier:

missing bulk operators for
X_341:bat[:timestamp] := mal.manifold("mtime":str,"timestamp_add_msec_interval":str, X_313:bat[:timestamp], -28800000:lng);
X_2717:bat[:str] := mal.manifold("mtime":str, "timestamp_to_str":str, X_2715:bat[:timestamp], "%W":str);

The code also illustrates missing common expressions.
Added to BugTracker-2019

Reproducible: Always

Comment 26950

Date: 2019-04-13 22:01:12 +0200
From: MonetDB Mercurial Repository <>

Changeset c8750b195d3e made by Martin Kersten in the MonetDB repo, refers to this bug.

For complete details, see https//devmonetdborg/hg/MonetDB?cmd=changeset;node=c8750b195d3e

Changeset description:

Test case for bug #6695

Comment 27020

Date: 2019-06-04 10:37:22 +0200
From: @sjoerdmullender

Test is missing.

Comment 27022

Date: 2019-06-04 12:00:51 +0200
From: MonetDB Mercurial Repository <>

Changeset 0386cc50dd03 made by Sjoerd Mullender in the MonetDB repo, refers to this bug.

For complete details, see https//devmonetdborg/hg/MonetDB?cmd=changeset;node=0386cc50dd03

Changeset description:

Implemented bulk versions of mtime.timestamp_{add,sub}_msec_interval.
This fixes bug #6695.

Comment 27141

Date: 2019-07-16 04:12:59 +0200
From: Castro B <>

Thank you monet so your basically saying that if ill do that it will work?

Castro B,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
1 participant