Rapid Reviews for Outbreak Science #40
Comments
|
Vision: I’m working with scientists to conduct rapid, open reviews of preprint manuscripts so that other scientists, scientific journals, editors, reviewers, and journalists can rapidly identify the most important new science to help fight epidemics. I’m working open to help meet the needs of a diverse group of stakeholders in the context of outbreaks and beyond. |
|
Vision (Draft 2): Public health officials, scientists, scientific journals, and the media can identify the most important and valid preprint research to help fight outbreaks through rapid, open reviews. |
|
Hi Michael! I think your project is very interesting, and it can be very useful. About your vision, I think you can use words like scientists and journalist environment to make it shorter and with this, you don't have to repeat words Brenda. |
|
Beginning of a roadmap: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yWHa9K48fWaS0LGk5mYUqqPCOi9X-zgMRsCYVJlF6hc/edit?usp=sharing |
|
@brendazam Thanks! I changed it based on your suggestion. |
Project Lead: @majohansson
Mentor: Not assigned yet
Welcome to OL6, Cohort B! This issue will be used to track your project and progress during the program. Please use this checklist over the next few weeks as you start Open Leadership Training🎉 .
Before Week 1 (Sept 11): Your first mentorship call
Before Week 2 (Sept 18): First Cohort Call (Open by Design)
Before Week 3 (Sept 25): Mentorship call
Before Week 4 (Oct 2): Cohort Call (Build for Understanding)
This issue is here to help you keep track of work during the first month of the program. Please refer to the OL6 Syllabus for more detailed weekly notes and assignments past week 4.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: